TY - JOUR
T1 - Ki-67 antigen in lung neuroendocrine tumors: unraveling a role in clinical practice
AU - Pelosi, Giuseppe
AU - Rindi, Guido
AU - Travis, William D.
AU - Papotti, Mauro
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Classification of lung neuroendocrine (NE) tumors is a step-wise process with four tumor categories being identified by morphology, namely typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid, large-cell NE carcinoma, and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Ki-67 antigen or protein (henceforth simply Ki-67) has been largely studied in these tumors, but the clinical implications are so far not clear. A well-defined role has regarded the diagnostic use in the separation of TC and AC from SCLC in nonsurgical specimens, with monoclonal antibody MIB-1 resulting in the most used reagent after antigen retrieval procedures. Uncertainties, however, have arisen in its assessment, usually expressed as Ki-67 labeling index, because of some variability in obtaining either value of the fraction. A diagnostic role is currently lacking, even though there are significant differences in most cases between TC and AC, less so between large-cell NE carcinoma and SCLC. In addition, the prognostic role of Ki-67 is debated, likely due to methodological and biological reasons. The last challenge would be to identify an effective lung-specific grading system based on Ki-67 labeling index. In this review article, five relevant issues to Ki-67 have been addressed by using a question-answer methodology, with relevant key points discussing major interpretation issues. The conclusion is that Ki-67 is a feasible and potentially meaningful marker in lung NE tumors, but more data are needed to determine its ideal function in this setting of tumors.
AB - Classification of lung neuroendocrine (NE) tumors is a step-wise process with four tumor categories being identified by morphology, namely typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid, large-cell NE carcinoma, and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Ki-67 antigen or protein (henceforth simply Ki-67) has been largely studied in these tumors, but the clinical implications are so far not clear. A well-defined role has regarded the diagnostic use in the separation of TC and AC from SCLC in nonsurgical specimens, with monoclonal antibody MIB-1 resulting in the most used reagent after antigen retrieval procedures. Uncertainties, however, have arisen in its assessment, usually expressed as Ki-67 labeling index, because of some variability in obtaining either value of the fraction. A diagnostic role is currently lacking, even though there are significant differences in most cases between TC and AC, less so between large-cell NE carcinoma and SCLC. In addition, the prognostic role of Ki-67 is debated, likely due to methodological and biological reasons. The last challenge would be to identify an effective lung-specific grading system based on Ki-67 labeling index. In this review article, five relevant issues to Ki-67 have been addressed by using a question-answer methodology, with relevant key points discussing major interpretation issues. The conclusion is that Ki-67 is a feasible and potentially meaningful marker in lung NE tumors, but more data are needed to determine its ideal function in this setting of tumors.
KW - Humans
KW - Ki-67 Antigen
KW - Lung Neoplasms
KW - Neuroendocrine Tumors
KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic
KW - Prognosis
KW - Tumor Markers, Biological
KW - Humans
KW - Ki-67 Antigen
KW - Lung Neoplasms
KW - Neuroendocrine Tumors
KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic
KW - Prognosis
KW - Tumor Markers, Biological
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/64314
U2 - 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000092
DO - 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000092
M3 - Article
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 9
SP - 273
EP - 284
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
ER -