Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

Key research questions for implementation of artificial intelligence in capsule endoscopy

  • R. Leenhardt*
  • , A. Koulaouzidis
  • , A. Histace
  • , G. Baatrup
  • , S. Beg
  • , A. Bourreille
  • , T. de Lange
  • , R. Eliakim
  • , D. Iakovidis
  • , Jensen M. Dam
  • , M. Keuchel
  • , Yehuda R. Margalit
  • , D. McNamara
  • , M. Mascarenhas
  • , Cristiano Spada
  • , S. Segui
  • , P. Smedsrud
  • , E. Toth
  • , G. E. Tontini
  • , E. Klang
  • X. Dray, U. Kopylov
*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin
  • CY Cergy Paris Université
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Imperial College NHS Trust
  • CHU de Nantes
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
  • Tel Aviv University
  • University of Thessaly
  • Lillebaelt Hospital
  • Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf
  • Tallaght University Hospital
  • Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João
  • University of Barcelona
  • University of Oslo
  • Lund University

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly infiltrating multiple areas in medicine, with gastrointestinal endoscopy paving the way in both research and clinical applications. Multiple challenges associated with the incorporation of AI in endoscopy are being addressed in recent consensus documents. Objectives: In the current paper, we aimed to map future challenges and areas of research for the incorporation of AI in capsule endoscopy (CE) practice. Design: Modified three-round Delphi consensus online survey. Methods: The study design was based on a modified three-round Delphi consensus online survey distributed to a group of CE and AI experts. Round one aimed to map out key research statements and challenges for the implementation of AI in CE. All queries addressing the same questions were merged into a single issue. The second round aimed to rank all generated questions during round one and to identify the top-ranked statements with the highest total score. Finally, the third round aimed to redistribute and rescore the top-ranked statements. Results: Twenty-one (16 gastroenterologists and 5 data scientists) experts participated in the survey. In the first round, 48 statements divided into seven themes were generated. After scoring all statements and rescoring the top 12, the question of AI use for identification and grading of small bowel pathologies was scored the highest (mean score 9.15), correlation of AI and human expert reading-second (9.05), and real-life feasibility-third (9.0). Conclusion: In summary, our current study points out a roadmap for future challenges and research areas on our way to fully incorporating AI in CE reading.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)175628482211326-175628482211326
Numero di pagine1
RivistaTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Volume15
Numero di pubblicazioneoct
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2022

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile

  1. SDG 3 - Salute e benessere
    SDG 3 Salute e benessere

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterologia

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • capsule endoscopy
  • research

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Key research questions for implementation of artificial intelligence in capsule endoscopy'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo