Abstract
The models provided by Kant and Hegel on the relationship between the individual and the
State are often represented as radically different alternatives. Kant’s concept of Moralität is
based on an individual who does not need a State, as an ethical totality, in order to determine
himself. On the contrary, by the concept of Sittlichkeit, Hegel maintains that moral principles
are not based on an unfathomable Factum, as the Kantian moral law, but should rather be
considered, at least partially, as a social construct. However one shall note that Hegel’s criticism
against Kant on this point answers a logical and systematic need, namely, to conceive the
singularity within a whole, a need Kant himself was however very sensitive to. Thus, although
their diverse approaches, they share a deep trust in the capacity of the human being of operating
within an ethical whole without losing his individual and moral essence.
Lingua originale | Portuguese |
---|---|
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | Filosofia & Atualidade |
Pagine | 81-98 |
Numero di pagine | 18 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2015 |
Evento | Jornadas Filosóficas Internacionais de Lisboa 2015 - Università di Lisbona Durata: 9 mar 2015 → 11 mar 2015 |
Convegno
Convegno | Jornadas Filosóficas Internacionais de Lisboa 2015 |
---|---|
Città | Università di Lisbona |
Periodo | 9/3/15 → 11/3/15 |
Keywords
- Kant, Hegel, Ethics, Morality, Right, Law, State