Kaldor's ‘technical progress function' and Verdoorn's law revisited

Marta Spreafico, John S.L. Mccombie

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

18 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Kaldor put forward his technical progress function as an alternative to the neoclas- sical aggregate production function. It is shown that Verdoorn’s law is its empirical counterpart, although allowing for increasing returns to scale. However, both may be derived from an aggregate Cobb-Douglas production function. But aggregation problems and the Cambridge capital theory controversies have shown theoretically that aggregate production functions in all probability do not exist. Moreover, the only reason that estimations of ‘aggregate production functions’ give good results is the existence of an accounting identity. This article reconsiders the technical progress function and Verdoorn’s law, especially in the light of these problems. Nevertheless, it is shown that estimates of the law do, in fact, provide insights into the growth process very similar to those of Kaldor, but viewed from another perspective.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)1117-1136
Numero di pagine20
RivistaCambridge Journal of Economics
Volume40
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2015

Keywords

  • Kaldor
  • Verdoorn's law
  • accountiong identity critique
  • aggregate production functions
  • technical progress function

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Kaldor's ‘technical progress function' and Verdoorn's law revisited'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo