Is two-dimensional field definition sufficient for pelvic node coverage in rectal cancer compared to technical three-dimensional definition?

Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Brunella Barbaro, Mario Balducci, Vincenzo Valentini, Danilo Pasini, Stefano Arcangeli, Alice Mannocci, Maria Cristina Barba, Stefania Manfrida, Bruce Daniel Minsky

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

1 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess the effectiveness of the potential advantages with 3-dimensional-based treatment planning versus 2-dimensional pelvic bone-based treatment planning in patients with rectal cancer, controlled for clinical stage.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)191-198
Numero di pagine8
RivistaTumori
Volume99
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2013

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Lymph Nodes
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Pelvis
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
  • Radiotherapy, Conformal
  • Rectal Neoplasms

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Is two-dimensional field definition sufficient for pelvic node coverage in rectal cancer compared to technical three-dimensional definition?'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo