Is the chronologic age a contra-indication for surgical palliation of unresectable periampullary neoplasms?

Gennaro Nuzzo, Gennaro Clemente, Francesco Greco, Raffaele Ionta, Federica Cadeddu

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

4 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Methods: Early and late results of surgical palliation for unresectable periampullary neoplasms were evaluated in 24 patients older than 70 years and compared with the same results obtained from 33 younger patients. The two groups of patients were comparable, except for age. Biliary bypass associated to gastric bypass was the most common performed procedure. Results: No significant differences in the results (morbidity, mortality, and outcome) were found in the two groups of patients. In addition, the results of palliative surgery in the elderly were compared with those obtained from a comparable group of 35 patients palliated with endoscopic stent insertion: surgical palliation resulted in better long-term results. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that the chronologic age is not a contraindication for surgical palliation of periampullary neoplasms and that surgery provides a better quality of residual life.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)206-209
Numero di pagine4
RivistaJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume88
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2004

Keywords

  • Age
  • Endoscopic stenting
  • Periampullary tumors
  • Surgical palliation
  • Unresectable tumors

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Is the chronologic age a contra-indication for surgical palliation of unresectable periampullary neoplasms?'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo