TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights on DRGs, guideline compliance and economic sustainability. The case of mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction
AU - Specchia, Maria Lucia
AU - Arcuri, Giovanni
AU - Di Pilla, Andrea
AU - Limongelli, Paola Enrica
AU - Salgarello, Marzia
AU - Masetti, Riccardo
AU - Bellantone, Rocco Domenico Alfonso
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background. Immediate breast reconstruction is recommended for eligible patients undergoing mastectomy, raising the issue of economic sustainability of both mastectomy and breast reconstruction performed within the same hospitalization, as opposed to two surgical procedures in two different hospitalizations. Study design. A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare economic sustainability of mastectomies with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Methods. Economic data on hospitalizations for mastectomy in a Teaching Hospital between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2021 were analyzed to assess their sustainability. Results. 338 admissions were selected (63.9% with immediate breast reconstruction (CI 99%: 57.2% to 70.6%). Compared to mastectomy alone, mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction had higher cost of € 2,245 (p < 0.001), with operating rooms and devices as main cost drivers. Current reimbursements rates (which are the same for mastectomy alone and for mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction) led to an average loss of € 1,719 for each mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Conclusion. Current DRGs reimbursement rates for hospital admissions for breast cancer surgery do not guarantee immediate breast reconstruction’s economic sustainability. DRGs system should be revised, or other solutions as bundled payment should be implemented in the light of the costs of innovation in healthcare, considering mastectomy and breast reconstruction steps in a path of linked actions aimed at improving patients’ health.
AB - Background. Immediate breast reconstruction is recommended for eligible patients undergoing mastectomy, raising the issue of economic sustainability of both mastectomy and breast reconstruction performed within the same hospitalization, as opposed to two surgical procedures in two different hospitalizations. Study design. A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare economic sustainability of mastectomies with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Methods. Economic data on hospitalizations for mastectomy in a Teaching Hospital between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2021 were analyzed to assess their sustainability. Results. 338 admissions were selected (63.9% with immediate breast reconstruction (CI 99%: 57.2% to 70.6%). Compared to mastectomy alone, mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction had higher cost of € 2,245 (p < 0.001), with operating rooms and devices as main cost drivers. Current reimbursements rates (which are the same for mastectomy alone and for mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction) led to an average loss of € 1,719 for each mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Conclusion. Current DRGs reimbursement rates for hospital admissions for breast cancer surgery do not guarantee immediate breast reconstruction’s economic sustainability. DRGs system should be revised, or other solutions as bundled payment should be implemented in the light of the costs of innovation in healthcare, considering mastectomy and breast reconstruction steps in a path of linked actions aimed at improving patients’ health.
KW - Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs)
KW - Governance
KW - Guideline
KW - Immediate Breast Reconstruction (IBR)
KW - Sustainability
KW - Women’s Health
KW - Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs)
KW - Governance
KW - Guideline
KW - Immediate Breast Reconstruction (IBR)
KW - Sustainability
KW - Women’s Health
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/208342
U2 - 10.7416/ai.2022.2524
DO - 10.7416/ai.2022.2524
M3 - Article
SN - 1120-9135
SP - 240
EP - 249
JO - Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita
JF - Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita
ER -