TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving outcomes of in situ split liver transplantation in Italy over the last 25 years
AU - Lauterio, Andrea
AU - Cillo, Umberto
AU - Spada, Marco
AU - Trapani, Silvia
AU - De Carlis, Riccardo
AU - Bottino, Giuliano
AU - Bernasconi, Davide
AU - Scalamogna, Chiara
AU - Pinelli, Domenico
AU - Cintorino, Davide
AU - D'Amico, Francesco Enrico
AU - Spagnoletti, Gionata
AU - Miggino, Marco
AU - Romagnoli, Renato
AU - Centonze, Leonardo
AU - Caccamo, Lucio
AU - Baccarani, Umberto
AU - Carraro, Amedeo
AU - Cescon, Matteo
AU - Vivarelli, Marco
AU - Mazaferro, Vincenzo
AU - Ettorre, Giuseppe Maria
AU - Rossi, Massimo
AU - Vennarecci, Giovanni
AU - De Simone, Paolo
AU - Angelico, Roberta
AU - Agnes, Salvatore
AU - Di Benedetto, Fabrizio
AU - Lupo, Luigi Giovanni
AU - Zamboni, Fausto
AU - Zefelippo, Arianna
AU - Patrono, Damiano
AU - Diviacco, Pietro
AU - Laureiro, Zoe Larghi
AU - Gringeri, Enrico
AU - Di Francesco, Fabrizio
AU - Lucianetti, Alessandro
AU - Valsecchi, Maria Grazia
AU - Gruttadauria, Salvatore
AU - De Feo, Tullia
AU - Cardillo, Massimo
AU - De Carlis, Luciano
AU - Colledan, Michele
AU - Andorno, Enzo
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background & Aims: Split liver transplant(ation) (SLT) is still considered a challenging procedure that is by no means widely accepted. We aimed to present data on 25-year trends in SLT in Italy, and to investigate if, and to what extent, outcomes have improved nationwide during this time. Methods: The study included all consecutive SLTs performed from May 1993 to December 2019, divided into three consecutive periods: 1993–2005, 2006–2014, and 2015–2019, which match changes in national allocation policies. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival, and the relative impact of each study period. Results: SLT accounted for 8.9% of all liver transplants performed in Italy. A total of 1,715 in situ split liver grafts were included in the analysis: 868 left lateral segments (LLSs) and 847 extended right grafts (ERGs). A significant improvement in patient and graft survival (p <0.001) was observed with ERGs over the three periods. Predictors of graft survival were cold ischaemia time (CIT) <6 h (p = 0.009), UNOS status 2b (p <0.001), UNOS status 3 (p = 0.009), and transplant centre volumes: 25–50 cases vs. <25 cases (p = 0.003). Patient survival was significantly higher with LLS grafts in period 2 vs. period 1 (p = 0.008). No significant improvement in graft survival was seen over the three periods, where predictors of graft survival were CIT <6 h (p = 0.007), CIT <6 h vs. ≥10 h (p = 0.019), UNOS status 2b (p = 0.038), and UNOS status 3 (p = 0.009). Retransplantation was a risk factor in split liver graft recipients, with significantly worse graft and patient survival for both types of graft (p <0.001). Conclusions: Our analysis showed Italian SLT outcomes to have improved over the last 25 years. These results could help to dispel reservations regarding the use of this procedure. Impact and implications: Split liver transplant(ation) (SLT) is still considered a challenging procedure and is by no means widely accepted. This study included all consecutive in situ SLTs performed in Italy from May 1993 to December 2019. With more than 1,700 cases, it is one of the largest series, examining long-term national trends in in situ SLT since its introduction. The data presented indicate that the outcomes of SLT improved during this 25-year period. Improvements are probably due to better recipient selection, refinements in surgical technique, conservative graft-to-recipient matching, and the continuous, yet carefully managed, expansion of donor selection criteria under a strict mandatory split liver allocation policy. These results could help to dispel reservations regarding the use of this procedure.
AB - Background & Aims: Split liver transplant(ation) (SLT) is still considered a challenging procedure that is by no means widely accepted. We aimed to present data on 25-year trends in SLT in Italy, and to investigate if, and to what extent, outcomes have improved nationwide during this time. Methods: The study included all consecutive SLTs performed from May 1993 to December 2019, divided into three consecutive periods: 1993–2005, 2006–2014, and 2015–2019, which match changes in national allocation policies. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival, and the relative impact of each study period. Results: SLT accounted for 8.9% of all liver transplants performed in Italy. A total of 1,715 in situ split liver grafts were included in the analysis: 868 left lateral segments (LLSs) and 847 extended right grafts (ERGs). A significant improvement in patient and graft survival (p <0.001) was observed with ERGs over the three periods. Predictors of graft survival were cold ischaemia time (CIT) <6 h (p = 0.009), UNOS status 2b (p <0.001), UNOS status 3 (p = 0.009), and transplant centre volumes: 25–50 cases vs. <25 cases (p = 0.003). Patient survival was significantly higher with LLS grafts in period 2 vs. period 1 (p = 0.008). No significant improvement in graft survival was seen over the three periods, where predictors of graft survival were CIT <6 h (p = 0.007), CIT <6 h vs. ≥10 h (p = 0.019), UNOS status 2b (p = 0.038), and UNOS status 3 (p = 0.009). Retransplantation was a risk factor in split liver graft recipients, with significantly worse graft and patient survival for both types of graft (p <0.001). Conclusions: Our analysis showed Italian SLT outcomes to have improved over the last 25 years. These results could help to dispel reservations regarding the use of this procedure. Impact and implications: Split liver transplant(ation) (SLT) is still considered a challenging procedure and is by no means widely accepted. This study included all consecutive in situ SLTs performed in Italy from May 1993 to December 2019. With more than 1,700 cases, it is one of the largest series, examining long-term national trends in in situ SLT since its introduction. The data presented indicate that the outcomes of SLT improved during this 25-year period. Improvements are probably due to better recipient selection, refinements in surgical technique, conservative graft-to-recipient matching, and the continuous, yet carefully managed, expansion of donor selection criteria under a strict mandatory split liver allocation policy. These results could help to dispel reservations regarding the use of this procedure.
KW - Split liver transplant
KW - graft
KW - learning curve
KW - pediatric liver transplant
KW - organ allocation policy
KW - outcomes
KW - living donor liver transplant
KW - Split liver transplant
KW - graft
KW - learning curve
KW - pediatric liver transplant
KW - organ allocation policy
KW - outcomes
KW - living donor liver transplant
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/300746
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.07.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.07.009
M3 - Article
SN - 0168-8278
VL - 79
SP - 1459
EP - 1468
JO - Journal of Hepatology
JF - Journal of Hepatology
ER -