Improving outcomes of in situ split liver transplantation in Italy over the last 25 years

Andrea Lauterio, Umberto Cillo, Marco Spada, Silvia Trapani, Riccardo De Carlis, Giuliano Bottino, Davide Bernasconi, Chiara Scalamogna, Domenico Pinelli, Davide Cintorino, Francesco Enrico D'Amico, Gionata Spagnoletti, Marco Miggino, Renato Romagnoli, Leonardo Centonze, Lucio Caccamo, Umberto Baccarani, Amedeo Carraro, Matteo Cescon, Marco VivarelliVincenzo Mazaferro, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre, Massimo Rossi, Giovanni Vennarecci, Paolo De Simone, Roberta Angelico, Salvatore Agnes, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Luigi Giovanni Lupo, Fausto Zamboni, Arianna Zefelippo, Damiano Patrono, Pietro Diviacco, Zoe Larghi Laureiro, Enrico Gringeri, Fabrizio Di Francesco, Alessandro Lucianetti, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Salvatore Gruttadauria, Tullia De Feo, Massimo Cardillo, Luciano De Carlis, Michele Colledan, Enzo Andorno

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

Abstract

Background & Aims: Split liver transplant(ation) (SLT) is still considered a challenging procedure that is by no means widely accepted. We aimed to present data on 25-year trends in SLT in Italy, and to investigate if, and to what extent, outcomes have improved nationwide during this time. Methods: The study included all consecutive SLTs performed from May 1993 to December 2019, divided into three consecutive periods: 1993–2005, 2006–2014, and 2015–2019, which match changes in national allocation policies. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival, and the relative impact of each study period. Results: SLT accounted for 8.9% of all liver transplants performed in Italy. A total of 1,715 in situ split liver grafts were included in the analysis: 868 left lateral segments (LLSs) and 847 extended right grafts (ERGs). A significant improvement in patient and graft survival (p <0.001) was observed with ERGs over the three periods. Predictors of graft survival were cold ischaemia time (CIT) <6 h (p = 0.009), UNOS status 2b (p <0.001), UNOS status 3 (p = 0.009), and transplant centre volumes: 25–50 cases vs. <25 cases (p = 0.003). Patient survival was significantly higher with LLS grafts in period 2 vs. period 1 (p = 0.008). No significant improvement in graft survival was seen over the three periods, where predictors of graft survival were CIT <6 h (p = 0.007), CIT <6 h vs. ≥10 h (p = 0.019), UNOS status 2b (p = 0.038), and UNOS status 3 (p = 0.009). Retransplantation was a risk factor in split liver graft recipients, with significantly worse graft and patient survival for both types of graft (p <0.001). Conclusions: Our analysis showed Italian SLT outcomes to have improved over the last 25 years. These results could help to dispel reservations regarding the use of this procedure. Impact and implications: Split liver transplant(ation) (SLT) is still considered a challenging procedure and is by no means widely accepted. This study included all consecutive in situ SLTs performed in Italy from May 1993 to December 2019. With more than 1,700 cases, it is one of the largest series, examining long-term national trends in in situ SLT since its introduction. The data presented indicate that the outcomes of SLT improved during this 25-year period. Improvements are probably due to better recipient selection, refinements in surgical technique, conservative graft-to-recipient matching, and the continuous, yet carefully managed, expansion of donor selection criteria under a strict mandatory split liver allocation policy. These results could help to dispel reservations regarding the use of this procedure.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)1459-1468
Numero di pagine10
RivistaJournal of Hepatology
Volume79
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2023

Keywords

  • Split liver transplant
  • graft
  • learning curve
  • pediatric liver transplant
  • organ allocation policy
  • outcomes
  • living donor liver transplant

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Improving outcomes of in situ split liver transplantation in Italy over the last 25 years'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo