Abstract
Researchers often make use of linear regression models in order to assess the\r\nimpact of policies on target outcomes. In a correctly specified linear regression\r\nmodel, the marginal impact is simply measured by the linear regression coefficient.\r\nHowever, when dealing with both synchronic and diachronic spatial data, the\r\ninterpretation of the parameters is more complex because the effects of policies\r\nextend to the neighboring locations. Summary measures have been suggested in the\r\nliterature for the cross-sectional spatial linear regression models and spatial panel\r\ndatamodels. Inthis article,wecompare threeprocedures fortestingthesignificance\r\nofimpactmeasuresinthespatiallinearregressionmodels.Theseproceduresinclude\r\n(i) the estimating equation approach, (ii) the classical delta method, and (iii) the\r\nsimulationmethod.InaMonteCarlostudy,wecomparethefinitesampleproperties\r\nof these procedures.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 1-36 |
| Numero di pagine | 36 |
| Rivista | International Regional Science Review |
| Volume | 2019 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 1 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2019 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Scienze Ambientali Generali
- Scienze Sociali Generali
Keywords
- MLE
- asymptotic approximation
- direct effects
- impactmeasures
- indirect effects
- inference
- spatialautoregressivemodels
- spatialeconometricmodels
- standard errors
- total effects
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Impact measures in spatial autoregressive models'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver