Abstract
The jurisprudence that in the untitled occupation of other people's goods identifies in the damage suffered by the owner a hypothesis of damage in re ipsa, with consequent lightening burden of proof of the injured party, calls for a comparison with the rules and principles which govern the recoverability of the damage. The damage-event and amage-consequence dichotomy, in particular, requires a reconsideration of the formula of the damage in re ipsa which, in the present case, can effectively materialize in a correct application and valorisation of the evidence for presumptions.
| Titolo tradotto del contributo | The (property) damage in re ipsa... must be proven |
|---|---|
| Lingua originale | Italian |
| pagine (da-a) | 402-405 |
| Numero di pagine | 4 |
| Rivista | DANNO E RESPONSABILITÀ |
| Volume | 2019 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 3 |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2019 |
Keywords
- Danno patrimoniale
- occupazione abusiva di immobile
- onere della prova