TY - JOUR
T1 - Hybrid Robotics for Endoscopic Transnasal Skull Base Surgery: Single-Centre Case Series
AU - Zappa, Francesca
AU - Madoglio, Alba
AU - Ferrari, Marco
AU - Mattavelli, Davide
AU - Schreiber, Alberto
AU - Taboni, Stefano
AU - Ferrari, Erika
AU - Rampinelli, Vittorio
AU - Belotti, Francesco
AU - Piazza, Cesare
AU - Fontanella, Marco Maria
AU - Nicolai, Piero
AU - Doglietto, Francesco
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - BACKGROUND: Only preclinical studies and case reports have described robotic surgery for endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of a novel robotic endoscope holder, developed for transsphenoidal surgery. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled for 3 mo at the Neurosurgery Unit of Brescia. Endoscope Robot® was used to assist during the sphenoidal phase of the approach, tumor removal, and skull base reconstruction. A Likert scale questionnaire was given to all surgeons after each procedure. Patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery were matched with nonrobotic ones for pathology and type of procedure. All surgical videos were evaluated during bimanual phases. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent robot-assisted, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for different pathologies (16 pituitary adenomas, 3 chordomas, 1 craniopharyngioma, 1 pituitary exploration for Cushing disease) for a total of 23 procedures (1 patient underwent 2 endoscopic revisions of a skull base reconstruction). Subjective advantages reported by surgeons included smoothness of movement, image steadiness, and improvement of maneuvers in narrow spaces and with angled endoscopes; as the main limitation, Endoscope Robot® appeared to be relatively heavy during the initial endoscope positioning. A comparative analysis with a historical matched cohort documented similar clinical outcomes, while endoscope lens cleaning and position readjustments were significantly less frequent in robotic procedures. CONCLUSION: Although confirmation in larger studies is needed, Endoscope Robot® was a safe and effective tool, especially advantageous in lengthy interventions through deep and narrow corridors.
AB - BACKGROUND: Only preclinical studies and case reports have described robotic surgery for endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of a novel robotic endoscope holder, developed for transsphenoidal surgery. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled for 3 mo at the Neurosurgery Unit of Brescia. Endoscope Robot® was used to assist during the sphenoidal phase of the approach, tumor removal, and skull base reconstruction. A Likert scale questionnaire was given to all surgeons after each procedure. Patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery were matched with nonrobotic ones for pathology and type of procedure. All surgical videos were evaluated during bimanual phases. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent robot-assisted, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for different pathologies (16 pituitary adenomas, 3 chordomas, 1 craniopharyngioma, 1 pituitary exploration for Cushing disease) for a total of 23 procedures (1 patient underwent 2 endoscopic revisions of a skull base reconstruction). Subjective advantages reported by surgeons included smoothness of movement, image steadiness, and improvement of maneuvers in narrow spaces and with angled endoscopes; as the main limitation, Endoscope Robot® appeared to be relatively heavy during the initial endoscope positioning. A comparative analysis with a historical matched cohort documented similar clinical outcomes, while endoscope lens cleaning and position readjustments were significantly less frequent in robotic procedures. CONCLUSION: Although confirmation in larger studies is needed, Endoscope Robot® was a safe and effective tool, especially advantageous in lengthy interventions through deep and narrow corridors.
KW - Case series
KW - Endoscopic skull base surgery
KW - Robotics
KW - Transsphenoidal surgery
KW - Case series
KW - Endoscopic skull base surgery
KW - Robotics
KW - Transsphenoidal surgery
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/206568
U2 - 10.1093/ons/opab327
DO - 10.1093/ons/opab327
M3 - Article
SN - 2332-4260
VL - 21
SP - 426
EP - 435
JO - Operative Neurosurgery
JF - Operative Neurosurgery
ER -