How many dystonias? Clinical evidence

Alberto Albanese*

*Autore corrispondente per questo lavoro

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolopeer review

11 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Literary reports on dystonia date back to post-Medieval times. Medical reports are instead more recent. We review here the early descriptions and the historical establishment of a consensus on the clinical phenomenology and the diagnostic features of dystonia syndromes. Lumping and splitting exercises have characterized this area of knowledge, and it remains largely unclear how many dystonia types we are to count. This review describes the history leading to recognize that focal dystonia syndromes are a coherent clinical set encompassing cranial dystonia (including blepharospasm), oromandibular dystonia, spasmodic torticollis, truncal dystonia, writer's cramp, and other occupational dystonias. Papers describing features of dystonia and diagnostic criteria are critically analyzed and put into historical perspective. Issues and inconsistencies in this lumping effort are discussed, and the currently unmet needs are critically reviewed.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)1-11
Numero di pagine11
RivistaFrontiers in Neurology
Volume8
Numero di pubblicazioneFEB
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2017
Pubblicato esternamente

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neurologia
  • Neurologia (clinica)

Keywords

  • Definition and concepts
  • Dystonia
  • History
  • Movement disorders
  • Neurology
  • Neurology (clinical)
  • Phenomenology

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'How many dystonias? Clinical evidence'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo