TY - JOUR
T1 - Health and income inequalities in Europe: What is the role of circumstances?
AU - Pasqualini, M.
AU - Lanari, D.
AU - Minelli, L.
AU - Pieroni, L.
AU - Salmasi, L.
AU - Salmasi, Luca
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Equality of opportunity theories distinguish between inequalities due to individual effort and those due to external circumstances. Recent research has shown that half of the variability in income of World population was determined by country of birth and income distribution. Since health and income are generally strictly related, the aim of this paper is to estimate how much variability in income and health is determined by external circumstances. We use data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement (SHARE) and the English Longitudinal Survey on Ageing (ELSA), two comparable multidisciplinary surveys that provide micro-level data on health and financial resources among the elderly for a large number of European countries. Our baseline estimation shows that about 20% of the variability in income is explained by current country-specific circumstances, while health outcomes range from 12% using BMI to 19% using self-rated health. By including early-life circumstances, the explained variability increases almost 20 percentage points for income and for self-rated health but less for other health outcomes. Finally, by controlling for endogeneity issues linked with effort, our estimates indicate that circumstances better explain variability in health outcomes. Results are robust to some tests, and the implications of these findings are discussed.
AB - Equality of opportunity theories distinguish between inequalities due to individual effort and those due to external circumstances. Recent research has shown that half of the variability in income of World population was determined by country of birth and income distribution. Since health and income are generally strictly related, the aim of this paper is to estimate how much variability in income and health is determined by external circumstances. We use data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement (SHARE) and the English Longitudinal Survey on Ageing (ELSA), two comparable multidisciplinary surveys that provide micro-level data on health and financial resources among the elderly for a large number of European countries. Our baseline estimation shows that about 20% of the variability in income is explained by current country-specific circumstances, while health outcomes range from 12% using BMI to 19% using self-rated health. By including early-life circumstances, the explained variability increases almost 20 percentage points for income and for self-rated health but less for other health outcomes. Finally, by controlling for endogeneity issues linked with effort, our estimates indicate that circumstances better explain variability in health outcomes. Results are robust to some tests, and the implications of these findings are discussed.
KW - Early-life circumstances
KW - Europe
KW - Health (social science)
KW - Health and income inequalities
KW - Inequality of opportunity
KW - Social determinants of health
KW - Early-life circumstances
KW - Europe
KW - Health (social science)
KW - Health and income inequalities
KW - Inequality of opportunity
KW - Social determinants of health
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/117949
UR - http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622964/description#description
U2 - 10.1016/j.ehb.2017.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ehb.2017.04.002
M3 - Article
SN - 1570-677X
SP - 164
EP - 173
JO - Economics and Human Biology
JF - Economics and Human Biology
ER -