TY - JOUR
T1 - HDR interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in the treatment of primary and recurrent head and neck malignancies
AU - Bussu, Francesco
AU - Tagliaferri, Luca
AU - Mattiucci, Gian Carlo
AU - Parrilla, Claudio
AU - Rizzo, Davide
AU - Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta
AU - Lancellotta, Valentina
AU - Autorino, Rosa
AU - Fonnesu, Carla
AU - Kihlgren, Caterina
AU - Galli, Jacopo
AU - Paludetti, Gaetano
AU - Kovács, György
AU - Valentini, Vincenzo
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - BACKGROUND:\r\n\r\nInterventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy; IRT) reemerged in the last decades as a potentially useful tool in head and neck oncology after a set of clear technical improvements were developed.\r\nMETHODS:\r\n\r\nSixty-one high dose ratio (HDR) IRT treatments were recommended and performed on 58 patients. We classified the cases into four relatively homogeneous groups based on the clinical needs that led to the recommended IRT. Also, we separately evaluated primary and recurrent cases.\r\nRESULTS:\r\n\r\nDisease-specific survival was significantly different among the four treatment groups. The group with the best prognosis was the cohort treated locally by exclusive interstitial IRT for resectable midface malignancies (2-year relapse-free survival = 82%, disease-specific survival = 89%).\r\nCONCLUSION:\r\n\r\nHDR IRT is a valuable tool in well-defined clinical situations and, in particular, in recurrences. In midface malignancies, it could become the preferred primary treatment.
AB - BACKGROUND:\r\n\r\nInterventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy; IRT) reemerged in the last decades as a potentially useful tool in head and neck oncology after a set of clear technical improvements were developed.\r\nMETHODS:\r\n\r\nSixty-one high dose ratio (HDR) IRT treatments were recommended and performed on 58 patients. We classified the cases into four relatively homogeneous groups based on the clinical needs that led to the recommended IRT. Also, we separately evaluated primary and recurrent cases.\r\nRESULTS:\r\n\r\nDisease-specific survival was significantly different among the four treatment groups. The group with the best prognosis was the cohort treated locally by exclusive interstitial IRT for resectable midface malignancies (2-year relapse-free survival = 82%, disease-specific survival = 89%).\r\nCONCLUSION:\r\n\r\nHDR IRT is a valuable tool in well-defined clinical situations and, in particular, in recurrences. In midface malignancies, it could become the preferred primary treatment.
KW - HDR
KW - brachytherapy
KW - head and neck cancer
KW - interventional radiotherapy
KW - nose vestibule
KW - HDR
KW - brachytherapy
KW - head and neck cancer
KW - interventional radiotherapy
KW - nose vestibule
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/148655
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85060975692&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85060975692&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1002/hed.25646
DO - 10.1002/hed.25646
M3 - Article
SN - 1043-3074
VL - 41
SP - 1667
EP - 1675
JO - HEAD & NECK
JF - HEAD & NECK
IS - 6
ER -