Abstract
Several experimental studies have shown that bone–tendon p0310
graft healing in ACL reconstruction occurs in a period varying
from 3 to 12 weeks. The quality and rate of healing
depend on many variables, predominantly the type of
graft. Soft tissue grafts such as hamstring tendon grafts
heal within a bone tunnel by formation of a fibrous transitional
layer between the tendon and bone, which contains penetrating Sharpey-like fibers. This newly formed bone–
tendon interface matures with time and resembles the
indirect-type insertion observed in tendons and ligaments.
Bone plug tendon grafts, such as patellar tendon, heal
within bone tunnel by incorporation of the bone plug to
the surrounding bone and formation of an indirect-type
insertion at the interface between bone and the intraosseous
fibrous portion of the graft. Bone–bone healing occurs more
rapidly than tendon—bone healing. Resistance to pullout
force appears to be similar between the two types of grafts
by 8 to 12 weeks after surgery. Therefore soft tissue grafts
need high primary fixation strength and stiffness because
of the consistent risk of failure due to pullout from the tunnel
during the first 2 months. Mechanical stresses can affect
maturation and differentiation of the bone–tendon graft
junction depending on many factors such as bone density,
fixation, placement and tensioning of the graft, gap size,
and postoperative immobilization. Compression of the graft
within the tunnel can enhance healing for both the bone
plug and soft tissue. However, during the first 3 months
after an ACL reconstruction, regardless of the type of graft
used, the strength of the bone–tendon graft junction does
not influence the mechanical behavior of the femur–ACL
graft–tibia complex because the weak link of the ligament
replacement rapidly shifts from the fixation site to the midsubstance
of the graft. Therefore the application of excessive
loads during this period, such as a too-aggressive rehabilitation
and early return to sport activities, may cause a permanent
elongation of the graft, thus compromising the
result of the reconstruction. Many efforts have been
made to improve the quality and rate of bone–tendon
healing. Tissue engineering and gene transfer techniques
have been applied to obtain a direct-type fibrocartilaginous
insertion of the ACL graft, similar to that of the native
ligament, and to accelerate the healing process of tendon
grafts within bone tunnel. However, more investigations
will be necessary in the near future to evaluate the possible
employment of these biological techniques in the clinical
practice.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | The anterior cruciate ligament. Reconstruction and basic siene |
Editor | C. Chadwick Prodromos |
Pagine | 417-426 |
Numero di pagine | 10 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2008 |
Keywords
- Anterior cruiate ligament
- Biology
- Healing
- Reconstruction