Abstract
In today’s innovation-driven agrifood domain, the perspective of using so-called New Breeding Techniques (NBTs) on both non-human animals and plants calls into question the regulatory approach (process/product-based) to be used, while asking for a critical reflection on the potential impact of products on the industrial sector and citizens. A possible reconfiguration of European (EU) discipline will have to grapple with not only agrifood market’s interests and needs, but mostly and primarily with the growing quest for public and participatory discussion on the current dominant vision on life sciences. Only through restoring visibility to the intertwining of knowledge production will it be possible to obtain EU governance of gene editing that is more authoritatively reliable from a scientific stance, as well as more transparently discussed and democratically shared at legal and policy level.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 766-780 |
| Numero di pagine | 15 |
| Rivista | European Journal of Risk Regulation |
| Volume | 10 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 4 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2019 |
OSS delle Nazioni Unite
Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile
-
SDG 9 Imprese, innovazione e infrastrutture
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Ricerca sulla Sicurezza
- Legge
Keywords
- gene editing
- science regulation
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Gene Editing for the EU Agrifood: Risks and Promises in Science Regulation'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver