Abstract
This paper examines trading activity in cryptocurrencies in times of geopolitical crises. Cryptocurrencies
represent speculative assets as well as payment methods. This combination of features
is not present in securities like stocks and bonds. The empirical analysis is based on a sample of 93
events associated to potential limitations of a fiat currency circulation and considers five cryptos
(Bitcoin, Ether, Ripple, Dash, and Tether). We find that trading in cryptocurrencies increases with
events of geopolitical tensions. The increase in cryptocurrencies trading in times of crises can be
motivated by different explanations (e.g., protecting savings as the domestic currency devaluates,
making payments as the domestic financial system is no longer available, avoiding sanctions)
which are difficult to disentangle. A more specific analysis concerning the EU sanctions established
in 2022 on Russia shows that crypto trading slows down when crypto-related services
(wallet, account or custody services) are explicitly included in EU financial sanctions packages. A
warning about data limitations: the data set only includes trading activities conducted on
centralized exchanges (CEXs) and does not include transactions conducted on decentralized exchanges
(DEXs). Sanctions are supposed to be more effective on CEXs where the platform acts as a
custodian for trader’s asset. We also examine trading activity from the Ukranian Hrvynia to
cryptocurrencies and find a strong increase in outflow from Hrvynia since the beginning of the
conflict. This finding – which is not affected by donations of cryptos received by Ukraine from
abroad – is consistent with the hypothesis that Ukrainians increasingly exchanged their domestic
currency for cryptocurrencies.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 498-523 |
Numero di pagine | 26 |
Rivista | International Review of Economics and Finance |
Volume | 89 |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2024 |
Keywords
- Blockchain
- Cryptocurrency
- EU Sanctions