Abstract
2. Firing structures and transition periods in
Rajasthan (India, 2005-2015)
Unstable choices before definitive selection
Valentine Roux
Simone Gabbriellini
1. Introduction
1
In prehistory, the so-called transition periods are framed by a before and an after, periods that are culturally
well-identifed owing to collections of traits whose inter-site differentiation marks out spatiotemporal outlines.
This allows us to characterise cultural groups and give them a cultural and sociological interpretation, that is to
say, an interpretation in terms of singular and historical features on the one hand and of population structure on
the other. The term ‘population structure’ refers to “instances where individual subpopulations/groups exhibit
low within and high between variability” (Shennan et alii 2015: 103). In prehistory, this variability of features
clearly distinguishes well-identifed chrono-cultural groups. The mechanism underlying the formation of spatial
confgurations signifcant to population structure is cultural transmission, which is done by trainers, often parents,
who tend to be selected within one’s social group. Regarding the transmission of techniques, the consequence is
that technological boundaries conform to social boundaries (Lave & Wenger 1991; Stark 1998; Gosselain 2000;
2011) thus revealing population structures.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite | Technology in Crisis. Technological changes in ceramic production during periods of trouble |
Editor | I Caloi, C Langohr |
Pagine | 35-44 |
Numero di pagine | 10 |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2018 |
Keywords
- evolutionary archaeology
- pottery firing techniques
- transition