TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group
AU - Spada, Cristiano
AU - Koulaouzidis, Anastasios
AU - Hassan, Cesare
AU - Amaro, Pedro
AU - Amaro, Pino
AU - Agrawal, Anurag
AU - Brink, Lene
AU - Fischbach, Wolfgang
AU - Hünger, Matthias
AU - Jover, Rodrigo
AU - Kinnunen, Urpo
AU - Ono, Akiko
AU - Patai, Árpád
AU - Pecere, Silvia
AU - Petruzziello, Lucio
AU - Riemann, Jürgenferdinand
AU - Staines, Harry
AU - Stringer, Ann L.
AU - Toth, Ervin
AU - Antonelli, Giulio
AU - Fuccio, Lorenzo
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group aims to raise awareness for improvement in colonoscopy standards across Europe. We analysed data collected on a sample of procedures conducted across Europe to evaluate the achievement of the polyp detection rate (PDR) target. We also investigated factors associated with PDR, in the hope of establishing areas that could lead to a quality improvement. Methods: 6445 form completions from 12 countries between 2 June 2016 and 30 April 2018 were considered for this analysis. We performed an exploratory analysislooking at PDR according to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) definition. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the most influential associated factors after adjusting for the other pre-specified variables. Results: In our sample therewere 3365 screening and diagnostic procedures performed in those over 50 years. The PDR was 40.5%, which is comparable with the ESGE minimum standard of 40%. The variables found to be associated with PDR were in descending order: Use of high-definition equipment, body mass index (BMI), patient gender, age group, and the reason for the procedure. Use of HD equipment was associated with a significant increase in the reporting of flat lesions (14.3% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.0001) and protruded lesions (34.7% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: On average, the sample of European practice captured by the ECQI survey meets the minimum PDR standard set by the ESGE. Our findings support the ESGE recommendation for routine use of HD colonoscopy.
AB - Background: The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group aims to raise awareness for improvement in colonoscopy standards across Europe. We analysed data collected on a sample of procedures conducted across Europe to evaluate the achievement of the polyp detection rate (PDR) target. We also investigated factors associated with PDR, in the hope of establishing areas that could lead to a quality improvement. Methods: 6445 form completions from 12 countries between 2 June 2016 and 30 April 2018 were considered for this analysis. We performed an exploratory analysislooking at PDR according to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) definition. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the most influential associated factors after adjusting for the other pre-specified variables. Results: In our sample therewere 3365 screening and diagnostic procedures performed in those over 50 years. The PDR was 40.5%, which is comparable with the ESGE minimum standard of 40%. The variables found to be associated with PDR were in descending order: Use of high-definition equipment, body mass index (BMI), patient gender, age group, and the reason for the procedure. Use of HD equipment was associated with a significant increase in the reporting of flat lesions (14.3% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.0001) and protruded lesions (34.7% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: On average, the sample of European practice captured by the ECQI survey meets the minimum PDR standard set by the ESGE. Our findings support the ESGE recommendation for routine use of HD colonoscopy.
KW - Colonoscopy
KW - Colonoscopy standards
KW - Survey
KW - Quality measures
KW - Polyp detection rate
KW - Colonoscopy
KW - Colonoscopy standards
KW - Survey
KW - Quality measures
KW - Polyp detection rate
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/250614
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph19063388
DO - 10.3390/ijerph19063388
M3 - Article
VL - 19
SP - 3388
EP - 3388
JO - Int J Environ Res Public Health
JF - Int J Environ Res Public Health
ER -