TY - JOUR
T1 - External vs. endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: has the current view changed?
AU - Savino, Gustavo
AU - Battendieri, Remo
AU - Traina, Salvatore
AU - Corbo, G.
AU - D'Amico, G.
AU - Gari, Mariangela
AU - Scarano, Emanuele
AU - Paludetti, Gaetano
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - In past years, external dacryocystorhinostomy has been considered the gold standard in terms of functional outcome for treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. In comparison, interest in the use of the recently developed endonasal dacyocystorhinostomy procedure has been rekindled because of advances in instrumentation. For the past 10 years, differences in the outcomes between the two techniques have been reduced; thus, currently, the choice of the type of surgery is associated with the experience of the surgeon, resources available in the healthcare system and patient preferences.
AB - In past years, external dacryocystorhinostomy has been considered the gold standard in terms of functional outcome for treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. In comparison, interest in the use of the recently developed endonasal dacyocystorhinostomy procedure has been rekindled because of advances in instrumentation. For the past 10 years, differences in the outcomes between the two techniques have been reduced; thus, currently, the choice of the type of surgery is associated with the experience of the surgeon, resources available in the healthcare system and patient preferences.
KW - External dacryocystorhinostomy
KW - Internal dacryocystorhinostomy
KW - External dacryocystorhinostomy
KW - Internal dacryocystorhinostomy
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/55836
M3 - Article
SN - 0001-6489
VL - 34
SP - 29
EP - 35
JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica
ER -