TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the organic acids lactic and acetic acids to reduce microbiological surface contamination on pork carcasses and pork cuts
AU - Silano, Vittorio
AU - Barat Baviera, José Manuel
AU - Bolognesi, Claudia
AU - Brüschweiler, Beat Johannes
AU - Chesson, Andrew
AU - Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
AU - Crebelli, Riccardo
AU - Gott, David Michael
AU - Grob, Konrad
AU - Lampi, Evgenia
AU - Riviere, Gilles
AU - Steffensen, Inger-Lise
AU - Tlustos, Christina
AU - Van Loveren, Henk
AU - Vernis, Laurence
AU - Zorn, Holger
AU - Bolton, Declan
AU - Bover-Cid, Sara
AU - De Knecht, Joop
AU - Peixe, Luisa
AU - Skandamis, Panagotis
AU - Baù, Andrea
AU - Martino, Carla
AU - Messens, Winy
AU - Sarno, Eleonora
AU - Tomcikova, Daniela
AU - Mortensen, Alicja
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of lactic and acetic acids to reduce microbiological surface contamination on pork carcasses pre-chill and pork meat cuts post-chill were assessed. Lactic acid treatments consisted of 2–5% solutions at temperatures of up to 80°C applied to carcasses by spraying or up to 55°C applied on cuts by spraying or dipping. Acetic acid treatments consisted of 2–4% solutions at temperatures of up to 40°C applied on carcasses by spraying or on cuts by spraying or dipping. The maximum treatment duration was 30 s. The Panel concluded that: [1] the treatments are of no safety concern, provided that the substances comply with the European Union specifications for food additives; [2] spraying of pork carcasses pre-chill with lactic acid was efficacious compared to untreated control, but based on the available data, the Panel could not conclude whether lactic acid was more efficacious than water treatment when spraying of pork carcasses pre-chill or pork meat cuts post-chill. The Panel concluded that dipping of pork meat cuts post-chill in lactic acid was more efficacious than water treatment. However, it could not conclude on the efficacy of acetic acid treatment of pork carcasses pre-chill and/or pork meat cuts post-chill; [3] the potential selection and emergence of bacteria with reduced susceptibility to biocides and/or resistance to therapeutic antimicrobials linked to the use of the substances is unlikely as long as Good Hygienic Practices are implemented; and [4] the release of both organic acids is not of concern for the environment, assuming that wastewaters released by the slaughterhouses are treated, if necessary, to counter the potentially low pH caused by lactic or acetic acid, in compliance with local rules.
AB - Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of lactic and acetic acids to reduce microbiological surface contamination on pork carcasses pre-chill and pork meat cuts post-chill were assessed. Lactic acid treatments consisted of 2–5% solutions at temperatures of up to 80°C applied to carcasses by spraying or up to 55°C applied on cuts by spraying or dipping. Acetic acid treatments consisted of 2–4% solutions at temperatures of up to 40°C applied on carcasses by spraying or on cuts by spraying or dipping. The maximum treatment duration was 30 s. The Panel concluded that: [1] the treatments are of no safety concern, provided that the substances comply with the European Union specifications for food additives; [2] spraying of pork carcasses pre-chill with lactic acid was efficacious compared to untreated control, but based on the available data, the Panel could not conclude whether lactic acid was more efficacious than water treatment when spraying of pork carcasses pre-chill or pork meat cuts post-chill. The Panel concluded that dipping of pork meat cuts post-chill in lactic acid was more efficacious than water treatment. However, it could not conclude on the efficacy of acetic acid treatment of pork carcasses pre-chill and/or pork meat cuts post-chill; [3] the potential selection and emergence of bacteria with reduced susceptibility to biocides and/or resistance to therapeutic antimicrobials linked to the use of the substances is unlikely as long as Good Hygienic Practices are implemented; and [4] the release of both organic acids is not of concern for the environment, assuming that wastewaters released by the slaughterhouses are treated, if necessary, to counter the potentially low pH caused by lactic or acetic acid, in compliance with local rules.
KW - Animal Science and Zoology
KW - Food Science
KW - Microbiology
KW - Parasitology
KW - Plant Science
KW - Veterinary (miscellaneous)
KW - acetic acid
KW - antimicrobial resistance
KW - efficacy
KW - environmental impact
KW - lactic acid
KW - pork carcasses and cuts
KW - toxicological safety
KW - Animal Science and Zoology
KW - Food Science
KW - Microbiology
KW - Parasitology
KW - Plant Science
KW - Veterinary (miscellaneous)
KW - acetic acid
KW - antimicrobial resistance
KW - efficacy
KW - environmental impact
KW - lactic acid
KW - pork carcasses and cuts
KW - toxicological safety
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/133453
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5482
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5482
M3 - Article
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 16
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
ER -