Abstract
This paper examines the legal procedure followed in Cimon’s trial, which took place at the end of the military campaign against Thasos (465/4-463/2 B.C.). The character of that suit has been much discussed, the main issue being whether Cimon’s lawsuit was an euthyna (as witnessed by Aristotle) or an eisangelia (as can be argued from Plutarch’s account). Although literary sources seem difficult to reconcile, the analysis of a scholion to Aeschines’ Against Timarchus (Schol. in Aisch. I, 1) may shed new light on Cimon’s suit and allow us to point out a new conciliative perspective linking euthyna to eisangelia.
| Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Autom. eng. transl.] Euthyna e / o Eisanghelia: il processo di Cimone |
|---|---|
| Lingua originale | Italian |
| pagine (da-a) | 21-30 |
| Numero di pagine | 10 |
| Rivista | AEVUM |
| Volume | LXXXVII |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2013 |
| Pubblicato esternamente | Sì |
Keywords
- ANCIENT GREEK LAW
- ATENE
- ATHENS
- CIMON
- CIMONE
- DIRITTO GRECO
- EISANGELIA
- EISANGHELIA
- EUTHYNA
- GREEK HISTORY
- KIMON
- SCHOL. IN AESCH. I, 1
- STORIA GRECA
- V CENTURY B.C.
- V SECOLO A.C.