Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in adults

  • Renaud Louis
  • , Imran Satia
  • , Inigo Ojanguren
  • , Florence Schleich
  • , Matteo Bonini
  • , Thomy Tonia
  • , David Rigau
  • , Anne Ten Brinke
  • , Roland Buhl
  • , Stelios Loukides
  • , Janwillem W.H. Kocks
  • , Louis-Philippe Boulet
  • , Arnaud Bourdin
  • , Courtney Coleman
  • , Karen Needham
  • , Mike Thomas
  • , Marco Idzko
  • , Alberto Papi
  • , Celeste Porsbjerg
  • , Daniel Schuermans
  • Joan B. Soriano, Omar S. Usmani
  • University of Liege
  • McMaster University
  • Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
  • University of Bern
  • Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre
  • Medical Centre Leeuwarden
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • General Practitioners Research Institute
  • Université Laval
  • Université de Montpellier
  • European Lung Foundation
  • University of Southampton
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • University of Ferrara
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Imperial College London

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo

Abstract

Although asthma is very common, affecting 5-10% of the population, the diagnosis of asthma in adults remains a challenge in the real world, which results in both over- and under-diagnosis. A taskforce was set up by the European Respiratory Society to systematically review the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of tests used to diagnose asthma in adult patients and provide recommendations for clinical practice. The taskforce defined eight Population, Index, Comparator and Outcome questions that were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The taskforce utilised the outcomes to develop an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm, with recommendations for a pragmatic guideline for everyday practice that was directed by real-life patient experiences. The taskforce supports the initial use of spirometry followed by bronchodilator reversibility testing (if airway obstruction is present). If initial spirometry fails to show obstruction, further tests should be performed in the following order: exhaled nitric oxide fraction, peak expiratory flow variability, or, in secondary care, bronchial challenge. We present the thresholds for each test that are compatible with a diagnosis of asthma in the presence of current symptoms. The taskforce reinforces spirometry as a priority and recognises the value of measuring blood eosinophils and serum immunoglobulin E to phenotype the patient. Measuring gas trapping by body plethysmography in patients with preserved forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio deserves further attention. The taskforce draws attention to the difficulty of making a correct diagnosis in patients already receiving inhaled corticosteroids; the comorbidities that may obscure diagnosis; the importance of phenotyping; and the necessity of considering the patient experience in the diagnostic process.
Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)1-10
Numero di pagine10
RivistaEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume60
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2022

Keywords

  • asthma

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in adults'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo