Epistemological and ethical challenges in standardized testing and collaborative assessment

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

10 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, the author proposes that although treating clients humanistically may appear to be in conflict with the goal of objectivity in clinical assessment, they are not incompatible; and, indeed, as it is shown, the clinical psychologist has a responsibility to hold both goals in mind in order to achieve the most useful and accurate evaluations. Psychological assessment does not have to aim to remain exclusively in the realm of the “hard” sciences. Nor should assessment be relegated to the realm of pure subjectivity. The triangulation of narratives, particularly in collaborative assessment, provides a means of unifying theories, languages, and ways of producing knowledge and of being professionally responsible.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)350-368
Numero di pagine19
RivistaJournal of Humanistic Psychology
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2012

Keywords

  • assessment
  • testing

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Epistemological and ethical challenges in standardized testing and collaborative assessment'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo