TY - JOUR
T1 - Enteroscopy in diagnosis and treatment of small bowel bleeding: A Delphi expert consensus
AU - Sorge, Andrea
AU - Elli, Luca
AU - Rondonotti, Emanuele
AU - Pennazio, Marco
AU - Spada, Cristiano
AU - Cadoni, Sergio
AU - Cannizzaro, Renato
AU - Cannizzaro, Rino
AU - Calabrese, Carlo
AU - Calabrese, Anna Chiara
AU - De Franchis, Roberto
AU - Girelli, Carlo Maria
AU - Marmo, Riccardo
AU - Riccioni, Maria Elena
AU - Marmo, Clelia
AU - Oliva, Salvatore
AU - Oliva, Stefano Claudio
AU - Scarpulla, Giuseppe
AU - Soncini, Marco
AU - Vecchi, Maurizio
AU - Tontini, Gian Eugenio
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Enteroscopy plays an important role in the management of small bowel bleeding. However, current guidelines are not specifically designed for small bowel bleeding and recommendations from different international societies do not always align. Consequently, there is heterogeneity in the definitions of clinical entities, clinical practice policies, and adherence to guidelines among clinicians. This represents an obstacle to providing the best patient care and to obtain homogeneous data for clinical research. Aims: The aims of the study were to establish a consensus on the definitions of bleeding entities and on the role of enteroscopy in the management of small bowel bleeding using a Delphi process. Methods: A core group of eight experts in enteroscopy identified five main topics of small bowel bleeding management and drafted statements on each topic. An expert panel of nine gastroenterologists participated in three rounds of the Delphi process, together with the core group. Results: A total of 33 statements were approved after three rounds of Delphi voting. Conclusion: This Delphi consensus proposes clear definitions and a unifying strategy to standardize the management of small bowel bleeding. Furthermore, it provides a useful guide in daily practice for both clinical and technical issues of enteroscopy.
AB - Background: Enteroscopy plays an important role in the management of small bowel bleeding. However, current guidelines are not specifically designed for small bowel bleeding and recommendations from different international societies do not always align. Consequently, there is heterogeneity in the definitions of clinical entities, clinical practice policies, and adherence to guidelines among clinicians. This represents an obstacle to providing the best patient care and to obtain homogeneous data for clinical research. Aims: The aims of the study were to establish a consensus on the definitions of bleeding entities and on the role of enteroscopy in the management of small bowel bleeding using a Delphi process. Methods: A core group of eight experts in enteroscopy identified five main topics of small bowel bleeding management and drafted statements on each topic. An expert panel of nine gastroenterologists participated in three rounds of the Delphi process, together with the core group. Results: A total of 33 statements were approved after three rounds of Delphi voting. Conclusion: This Delphi consensus proposes clear definitions and a unifying strategy to standardize the management of small bowel bleeding. Furthermore, it provides a useful guide in daily practice for both clinical and technical issues of enteroscopy.
KW - Capsule endoscopy
KW - Delphi consensus
KW - Enteroscopy
KW - Small bowel bleeding
KW - Capsule endoscopy
KW - Delphi consensus
KW - Enteroscopy
KW - Small bowel bleeding
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/250876
U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2022.08.021
DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2022.08.021
M3 - Article
SN - 1590-8658
VL - 55
SP - 29
EP - 39
JO - Digestive and Liver Disease
JF - Digestive and Liver Disease
ER -