TY - JOUR
T1 - Enterography CT without and with water enema in patients with Crohn's disease: Results from a comparative observational study in comparison with endoscopy
AU - Minordi, Laura Maria
AU - Scaldaferri, Franco
AU - Marra, Rosa Speranza
AU - Pecere, Silvia
AU - Larosa, Luigi
AU - Poscia, Andrea
AU - Gasbarrini, Antonio
AU - Vecchioli, Amorino
AU - Bonomo, Lorenzo
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objectives CT is nowadays an examination routinely performed in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. However, there are several ways to assess gastro-intestinal tract, in particular colonic segments. Aim of this study is to compare enterography-CT (E-CT), performed after oral administration of polyethylene-glycol solution (PEG-CT) versus enterography-CT performed also with water enema via rectum (ECT-WE) in patients with CD. Methods We have studied 79 patients with CD undergone to enterography-CT (42 evaluated with PEG-CT and 37 with ECT-WE) who have performed a lower endoscopy within 15 days before CT. CT results concerning large bowel were compared with endoscopic findings. Intestinal distension, discomfort of the patients, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. Pearson test was used for statistical analysis. Results Degree of abdominal pain was significantly higher in patients underwent to ECT-WE compared to PEG-CT. Distension of the colon was significantly greater in patients studied with ECT-WE compared to those studied with PEG-CT. Values of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of PEG-CT and ECT-WE were respectively 77, 86.5 and 81%, and 89, 100 and 92% in comparison with endoscopy. Conclusions In patients with CD, ECT-WE allows the evaluation of large bowel in addition to small bowel better than PEG-CT.
AB - Objectives CT is nowadays an examination routinely performed in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. However, there are several ways to assess gastro-intestinal tract, in particular colonic segments. Aim of this study is to compare enterography-CT (E-CT), performed after oral administration of polyethylene-glycol solution (PEG-CT) versus enterography-CT performed also with water enema via rectum (ECT-WE) in patients with CD. Methods We have studied 79 patients with CD undergone to enterography-CT (42 evaluated with PEG-CT and 37 with ECT-WE) who have performed a lower endoscopy within 15 days before CT. CT results concerning large bowel were compared with endoscopic findings. Intestinal distension, discomfort of the patients, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. Pearson test was used for statistical analysis. Results Degree of abdominal pain was significantly higher in patients underwent to ECT-WE compared to PEG-CT. Distension of the colon was significantly greater in patients studied with ECT-WE compared to those studied with PEG-CT. Values of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of PEG-CT and ECT-WE were respectively 77, 86.5 and 81%, and 89, 100 and 92% in comparison with endoscopy. Conclusions In patients with CD, ECT-WE allows the evaluation of large bowel in addition to small bowel better than PEG-CT.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Colon
KW - Crohn Disease
KW - Endoscopy
KW - Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
KW - Enema
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Intestine, Small
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Multidetector computed tomography
KW - Polyethylene Glycols
KW - Polyethylene glycols
KW - Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed
KW - Water
KW - Young Adult
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Colon
KW - Crohn Disease
KW - Endoscopy
KW - Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
KW - Enema
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Intestine, Small
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Multidetector computed tomography
KW - Polyethylene Glycols
KW - Polyethylene glycols
KW - Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed
KW - Water
KW - Young Adult
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/94198
UR - http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrad
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.028
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.028
M3 - Article
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 85
SP - 404
EP - 413
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
ER -