TY - JOUR
T1 - Enteral Nutrition Tolerance and REspiratory Support (ENTARES) Study in preterm infants: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
AU - Cresi, Francesco
AU - Maggiora, Elena
AU - Borgione, Silvia Maria
AU - Spada, Elena
AU - Coscia, Alessandra
AU - Coscia, Emanuele
AU - Bertino, Enrico
AU - Meneghin, Fabio
AU - Corvaglia, Luigi Tommaso
AU - Ventura, Maria Luisa
AU - Lista, Gianluca
AU - Mosca, Fabio
AU - Orsi, Anna
AU - Mercadante, Domenica
AU - Martinelli, Stefano
AU - Ilardi, Laura
AU - Proto, Alice
AU - Gatto, Sara
AU - Aceti, Arianna
AU - Sandri, Fabrizio
AU - Chakrokh, Roksana
AU - Laforgia, Nicola
AU - Di Mauro, Antonio
AU - Baldassarre, Maria E.
AU - Del Vecchio, Antonio
AU - Petrillo, Flavia
AU - Spalierno, Maria P.
AU - Raimondi, Francesco
AU - Capasso, Letizia
AU - Palma, Marta
AU - Farina, Daniele
AU - Campagnoli, Maria F.
AU - Boetti, Tatiana
AU - Logrippo, Federica
AU - Agosti, Massimo
AU - Morlacchi, Laura
AU - Perniciaro, Simona
AU - Dani, Carlo
AU - Elia, Serena
AU - Vento, Giovanni
AU - Maggio, Luca
AU - Stronati, Mauro
AU - Civardi, Elisa
AU - Lidia, Grappone
AU - Angela, Borrelli
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and feeding intolerance are common conditions in preterm infants and among the major causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. For many years, preterm infants with RDS have been treated with mechanical ventilation, increasing risks of acute lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In recent years non-invasive ventilation techniques have been developed. Showing similar efficacy and risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) have become the most widespread techniques in neonatal intensive care units. However, their impact on nutrition, particularly on feeding tolerance and risk of complications, is still unknown in preterm infants. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of NCPAP vs HHHFNC on enteral feeding and to identify the most suitable technique for preterm infants with RDS. Methods: A multicenter randomized single-blind controlled trial was designed. All preterm infants with a gestational age of 25-29 weeks treated with NCPAP or HHHFNC for RDS and demonstrating stability for at least 48 h along with the compliance with inclusion criteria (age less than 7 days, need for non-invasive respiratory support, suitability to start enteral feeding) will be enrolled in the study and randomized to the NCPAP or HHHFNC arm. All patients will be monitored until discharge, and data will be analyzed according to an intention-to-treat model. The primary outcome is the time to reach full enteral feeding, while parameters of respiratory support, feeding tolerance, and overall health status will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. The sample size was calculated at 141 patients per arm. Discussion: The identification of the most suitable technique (NCPAP vs HHHFNC) for preterm infants with feeding intolerance could reduce gastrointestinal complications, improve growth, and reduce hospital length of stay, thus improving clinical outcomes and reducing health costs. The evaluation of the timing of oral feeding could be useful in understanding the influence that these techniques could have on the development of sucking-swallow coordination. Moreover, the evaluation of the response to NCPAP and HHHFNC could clarify their efficacy as a treatment for RDS in extremely preterm infants. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03548324. Registered on 7 June 2018.
AB - Background: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and feeding intolerance are common conditions in preterm infants and among the major causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. For many years, preterm infants with RDS have been treated with mechanical ventilation, increasing risks of acute lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In recent years non-invasive ventilation techniques have been developed. Showing similar efficacy and risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) have become the most widespread techniques in neonatal intensive care units. However, their impact on nutrition, particularly on feeding tolerance and risk of complications, is still unknown in preterm infants. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of NCPAP vs HHHFNC on enteral feeding and to identify the most suitable technique for preterm infants with RDS. Methods: A multicenter randomized single-blind controlled trial was designed. All preterm infants with a gestational age of 25-29 weeks treated with NCPAP or HHHFNC for RDS and demonstrating stability for at least 48 h along with the compliance with inclusion criteria (age less than 7 days, need for non-invasive respiratory support, suitability to start enteral feeding) will be enrolled in the study and randomized to the NCPAP or HHHFNC arm. All patients will be monitored until discharge, and data will be analyzed according to an intention-to-treat model. The primary outcome is the time to reach full enteral feeding, while parameters of respiratory support, feeding tolerance, and overall health status will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. The sample size was calculated at 141 patients per arm. Discussion: The identification of the most suitable technique (NCPAP vs HHHFNC) for preterm infants with feeding intolerance could reduce gastrointestinal complications, improve growth, and reduce hospital length of stay, thus improving clinical outcomes and reducing health costs. The evaluation of the timing of oral feeding could be useful in understanding the influence that these techniques could have on the development of sucking-swallow coordination. Moreover, the evaluation of the response to NCPAP and HHHFNC could clarify their efficacy as a treatment for RDS in extremely preterm infants. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03548324. Registered on 7 June 2018.
KW - Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
KW - Enteral Nutrition
KW - Enteral nutrition
KW - Feeding intolerance
KW - Female
KW - Gestational Age
KW - HFNC
KW - Humans
KW - Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
KW - Infant, Extremely Premature
KW - Infant, Newborn
KW - Italy
KW - Lung
KW - Male
KW - Multicenter Studies as Topic
KW - NCPAP
KW - NEC
KW - Non-invasive ventilation
KW - Nutritional Support
KW - Premature Birth
KW - Preterm
KW - RDS
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Respiration
KW - Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
KW - Single-Blind Method
KW - Time Factors
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Very low birth weight infant
KW - Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
KW - Enteral Nutrition
KW - Enteral nutrition
KW - Feeding intolerance
KW - Female
KW - Gestational Age
KW - HFNC
KW - Humans
KW - Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
KW - Infant, Extremely Premature
KW - Infant, Newborn
KW - Italy
KW - Lung
KW - Male
KW - Multicenter Studies as Topic
KW - NCPAP
KW - NEC
KW - Non-invasive ventilation
KW - Nutritional Support
KW - Premature Birth
KW - Preterm
KW - RDS
KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
KW - Respiration
KW - Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
KW - Single-Blind Method
KW - Time Factors
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Very low birth weight infant
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/147550
UR - http://www.trialsjournal.com/home/
U2 - 10.1186/s13063-018-3119-0
DO - 10.1186/s13063-018-3119-0
M3 - Article
SN - 1745-6215
VL - 20
SP - 67-N/A
JO - Trials
JF - Trials
ER -