TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic Subtemporal Epidural Key-Hole Approach: Quantitative Anatomic Analysis of Three Surgical Corridors
AU - Rampinelli, Vittorio
AU - Agosti, Edoardo
AU - Saraceno, Giorgio
AU - Ferrari, Marco
AU - Taboni, Stefano
AU - Mattavelli, Davide
AU - Schreiber, Alberto
AU - Tomasoni, Michele
AU - Gualtieri, Tommaso
AU - Ravanelli, Marco
AU - Buffoli, Barbara
AU - Rezzani, Rita
AU - Fontanella, Marco Maria
AU - Nicolai, Piero
AU - Piazza, Cesare
AU - Deganello, Alberto
AU - Doglietto, Francesco
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: The endoscope-assisted subtemporal key-hole epidural approach (ESKEA) has been recently described. The aim of this study was to measure working volumes and exposure of key areas of the middle cranial fossa provided by this approach. Methods: Four fresh frozen cadaver heads were dissected to analyze 3 modular corridors (1A, 1B, and 2) harvested through ESKEA. A step-by-step dissection was performed, and key anatomic landmarks were recorded. A GTxEyesII-ApproachViewer was used to quantify the working volume and exposure of 4 different regions (sphenoorbital, parasellar, superior petrous apex, and squamopetrous). For each corridor, 3 incremental degrees of temporal dural retraction (5, 10, and 15 mm) were tested. Results: The working volume of all corridors progressively increased with degree of retraction: Corridors 1A, 1B, and 2 showed a gain in working volume of 21%, 27%, and 19% from 5 mm to 10 mm retraction, respectively, and a gain of 40%, 45%, and 44% from 5 mm to 15 mm retraction, respectively. The sphenoorbital area was exposed (27%−45%) through corridor 1A, and exposure significantly increased with the degree of retraction. Corridor 1B provided optimal exposure of parasellar areas (86%−100%) and superior petrous apex (70%−87%) regardless of the degree of retraction. The squamopetrous area was satisfactorily addressed through corridor 2 (88%) only with the highest degree of retraction. Conclusions: ESKEA can be conceived as a modular approach: the 3 surgical corridors have specific working volumes, which are clearly influenced by the degree of temporal lobe retraction, and provide exposure of different middle cranial fossa areas.
AB - Background: The endoscope-assisted subtemporal key-hole epidural approach (ESKEA) has been recently described. The aim of this study was to measure working volumes and exposure of key areas of the middle cranial fossa provided by this approach. Methods: Four fresh frozen cadaver heads were dissected to analyze 3 modular corridors (1A, 1B, and 2) harvested through ESKEA. A step-by-step dissection was performed, and key anatomic landmarks were recorded. A GTxEyesII-ApproachViewer was used to quantify the working volume and exposure of 4 different regions (sphenoorbital, parasellar, superior petrous apex, and squamopetrous). For each corridor, 3 incremental degrees of temporal dural retraction (5, 10, and 15 mm) were tested. Results: The working volume of all corridors progressively increased with degree of retraction: Corridors 1A, 1B, and 2 showed a gain in working volume of 21%, 27%, and 19% from 5 mm to 10 mm retraction, respectively, and a gain of 40%, 45%, and 44% from 5 mm to 15 mm retraction, respectively. The sphenoorbital area was exposed (27%−45%) through corridor 1A, and exposure significantly increased with the degree of retraction. Corridor 1B provided optimal exposure of parasellar areas (86%−100%) and superior petrous apex (70%−87%) regardless of the degree of retraction. The squamopetrous area was satisfactorily addressed through corridor 2 (88%) only with the highest degree of retraction. Conclusions: ESKEA can be conceived as a modular approach: the 3 surgical corridors have specific working volumes, which are clearly influenced by the degree of temporal lobe retraction, and provide exposure of different middle cranial fossa areas.
KW - Anatomy
KW - Endoscopy
KW - Subtemporal
KW - Preclinical
KW - Quantification
KW - Key-hole
KW - Anatomy
KW - Endoscopy
KW - Subtemporal
KW - Preclinical
KW - Quantification
KW - Key-hole
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/268827
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.055
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.055
M3 - Article
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 152
SP - 128
EP - 137
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -