Abstract
Aim: Aim of this study was to compare the removal of smear layer and organic debris within the tooth canal among conventional needle irrigation, EndoVac and Endoactivator. Methodology: Eighty single-rooted extracted human teeth were prepared with rotary NiTi instrumentation and randomly separated into 4 groups. Twenty teeth were used as positive control (Group 1), irrigated with only saline. Teeth assigned to Group 2 (n = 20) received irrigation with a conventional syringe and a 30-gauge needle (NaviTip, Ultradent, South Jordan, UT);
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 79-86 |
| Numero di pagine | 8 |
| Rivista | Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia |
| Volume | 28 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2014 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Odontoiatria Generale
Keywords
- Conventional irrigation
- Dentistry (all)
- EndoActivator
- EndoVac
- Organic debris
- Smear layer
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Efficacy of three different irrigation techniques in the removal of smear layer and organic debris from root canal wall: A scanning electron microscope study'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver