Abstract
Aim: Aim of this study was to compare the removal of smear layer and organic debris within the tooth canal among conventional needle irrigation, EndoVac and Endoactivator. Methodology: Eighty single-rooted extracted human teeth were prepared with rotary NiTi instrumentation and randomly separated into 4 groups. Twenty teeth were used as positive control (Group 1), irrigated with only saline. Teeth assigned to Group 2 (n = 20) received irrigation with a conventional syringe and a 30-gauge needle (NaviTip, Ultradent, South Jordan, UT);
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 79-86 |
Numero di pagine | 8 |
Rivista | Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia |
Volume | 28 |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2014 |
Keywords
- Conventional irrigation
- Dentistry (all)
- EndoActivator
- EndoVac
- Organic debris
- Smear layer