TY - JOUR
T1 - Early treatment of type II SMA slows rate of progression of scoliosis
AU - Coratti, Giorgia
AU - Lenkowicz, Jacopo
AU - Pera, Maria Carmela
AU - D'Amico, Adele
AU - Bruno, Claudio
AU - Gullì, Consolato
AU - Brolatti, Noemi
AU - Pedemonte, Marina
AU - Antonaci, Laura
AU - Ricci, Martina
AU - Capasso, Anna
AU - Cicala, Gianpaolo
AU - Cutrona, Costanza
AU - De Sanctis, Roberto
AU - Carnicella, Sara
AU - Forcina, Nicola
AU - Cateruccia, Michela
AU - Damasio, Maria Beatrice
AU - Labianca, Luca
AU - Manfroni, Francesca
AU - Leone, Antonio
AU - Bertini, Enrico
AU - Bertini, Enrico Silvio
AU - Pane, Marika
AU - Patarnello, Stefano
AU - Valentini, Vincenzo
AU - Mercuri, Eugenio Maria
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Type II spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) often leads to scoliosis in up to 90% of cases. While pharmacological treatments have shown improvements in motor function, their impact on scoliosis progression remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate potential differences in scoliosis progression between treated and untreated SMA II patients. Methods: Treatment effect on Cobb's angle annual changes and on reaching a 50° Cobb angle was analysed in treated and untreated type II SMA patients with a minimum 1.5-year follow-up. A sliding cut-off approach identified the optimal treatment subpopulation based on age, Cobb angle and Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded at the initial visit. Mann-Whitney U-test assessed statistical significance. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the untreated (n=46) and treated (n=39) populations. The mean Cobb angle variation did not significantly differ between the two groups (p=0.4). Optimal cut-off values for a better outcome were found to be having a Cobb angle <26° or an age <4.5 years. When using optimal cut-off, the treated group showed a lower mean Cobb variation compared with the untreated group (5.61 (SD 4.72) degrees/year vs 10.05 (SD 6.38) degrees/year; p=0.01). Cox-regression analysis indicated a protective treatment effect in reaching a 50° Cobb angle, significant in patients <4.5 years old (p=0.016). Conclusion: This study highlights that pharmacological treatment, if initiated early, may slow down the progression of scoliosis in type II SMA patients. Larger studies are warranted to further investigate the effectiveness of individual pharmacological treatment on scoliosis progression in this patient population.
AB - Background: Type II spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) often leads to scoliosis in up to 90% of cases. While pharmacological treatments have shown improvements in motor function, their impact on scoliosis progression remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate potential differences in scoliosis progression between treated and untreated SMA II patients. Methods: Treatment effect on Cobb's angle annual changes and on reaching a 50° Cobb angle was analysed in treated and untreated type II SMA patients with a minimum 1.5-year follow-up. A sliding cut-off approach identified the optimal treatment subpopulation based on age, Cobb angle and Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded at the initial visit. Mann-Whitney U-test assessed statistical significance. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the untreated (n=46) and treated (n=39) populations. The mean Cobb angle variation did not significantly differ between the two groups (p=0.4). Optimal cut-off values for a better outcome were found to be having a Cobb angle <26° or an age <4.5 years. When using optimal cut-off, the treated group showed a lower mean Cobb variation compared with the untreated group (5.61 (SD 4.72) degrees/year vs 10.05 (SD 6.38) degrees/year; p=0.01). Cox-regression analysis indicated a protective treatment effect in reaching a 50° Cobb angle, significant in patients <4.5 years old (p=0.016). Conclusion: This study highlights that pharmacological treatment, if initiated early, may slow down the progression of scoliosis in type II SMA patients. Larger studies are warranted to further investigate the effectiveness of individual pharmacological treatment on scoliosis progression in this patient population.
KW - NEUROPSYCHIATRY
KW - PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
KW - SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY
KW - NEUROPSYCHIATRY
KW - PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
KW - SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/260235
U2 - 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332084
DO - 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332084
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-3050
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
ER -