E-consensus on telemedicine in proctology: A RAND/UCLA-modified study

Carlo Ratto, Gaetano Gallo, Ugo Grossi, Alessandro Sturiale, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Arcangelo Picciariello, Sergio Pillon, Domenico Mascagni, Donato Francesco Altomare, Gabriele Naldini, Roberto Perinotti

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 is revolutionizing healthcare delivery. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus among experts as to the possible applications of telemedicine in the proctologic field. Methods: A group of 55 clinical practice recommendations was developed by a clinical guidance group based on coalescence of evidence and expert opinion. The Telemedicine in Proctology Italian Working Group included 47 Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery nominated experts evaluating the appropriateness of each clinical practice recommendations based on published RAND/UCLA methodology in 2 rounds. Results: Stakeholder median age was 53 years (interquartile range limits 40–60), and 38 (81%) were men. Nine (19%) panelists reported no experience with telemedicine before the pandemic. Agreement was obtained on a minimum of 3 to 5 years of practice in the proctologic field before starting teleconsultations, which should be regularly paid, with advice and prescriptions incorporated into a formal report sent to the patient by e-mail along with a receipt. Of the panelists, 35 of 47 (74%) agreed that teleconsultation carries the risk of misdiagnosis of cancer, thus recommending an in-person assessment before scheduling any surgery. Fifteen additional clinical practice recommendations were re-elaborated in the second round and assessed by 44 of 47 (93.6%) panelists. The application of telemedicine for the diagnosis of common proctologic conditions (eg, hemorrhoidal disease, anal abscess and fistula, anal condylomas, and anal fissure) and functional pelvic floor disorders was generally considered inappropriate. Teleconsultation was instead deemed appropriate for the diagnosis and management of pilonidal disease. Conclusion: This e-consensus revealed the boundaries of telemedicine in Italy. Standardization of infrastructures, logistics, and legality remain to be better elucidated.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)1-10
Numero di pagine10
RivistaSurgery
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2021

Keywords

  • telemedicina

Fingerprint Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'E-consensus on telemedicine in proctology: A RAND/UCLA-modified study'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo