TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the workup of men with obstructed defecation: a pilot study
AU - Ratto, Carlo
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - BACKGROUND: Dynamic transperineal ultrasound has been used in women for the
noninvasive investigation of functional disorders of the posterior pelvic floor,
but its use in men has been limited by technical difficulties related to the
consistency of the male perineum.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of dynamic
transperineal ultrasound in diagnosing posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in men.
DESIGN: This is a study of diagnostic accuracy.
SETTINGS: This study was performed at a public hospital.
PATIENTS: Forty-six men with symptoms of obstructed defecation were included.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent dynamic transperineal ultrasound 1 week
after standard defecography with manometric confirmation when rectoanal
dyssynergy was observed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Images were obtained, and anorectal angles were measured
under resting conditions and during maximal strain. The accuracy of the
sonographic method in diagnosing pelvic floor alterations was assessed against
defecography (reference method).
RESULTS: : Anorectal angles measured with ultrasound and defecography were not
significantly different under resting conditions or maximum strain. Sonographic
and reference method findings were concordant in 41 (89.1%) of the cases (25 with
rectoanal intussusceptions, 7 with rectorectal intussusceptions, 8 with rectoanal
dyssynergy, and 1 with rectorectal intussusception and dyssynergy). In 1 patient
with rectoanal intussusception, dynamic transperineal ultrasound was
nondiagnostic (low image quality probably due to dehydration of perineal
tissues). Discordant dynamic transperineal ultrasound findings included normal
findings in another patient with rectoanal intussusception, diagnosis of
rectoanal intussusception in 2 men with rectorectal intussusception, and failure
to detect dyssynergy in a second patient with rectorectal intussusception and
dyssynergy. The sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen κ indices for dynamic
transperineal ultrasound were 92.6%, 90.5%, and 82% (rectoanal intussusception);
81.8%, 100%, and 87% (rectorectal intussusception); 90%, 100%, and 93% (rectoanal
dyssynergy).
LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small size and by the absence of
patients with other morphofunctional disorders associated with obstructed
defecation.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic transperineal ultrasound is potentially useful for diagnosis
and follow-up of posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in men.
AB - BACKGROUND: Dynamic transperineal ultrasound has been used in women for the
noninvasive investigation of functional disorders of the posterior pelvic floor,
but its use in men has been limited by technical difficulties related to the
consistency of the male perineum.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of dynamic
transperineal ultrasound in diagnosing posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in men.
DESIGN: This is a study of diagnostic accuracy.
SETTINGS: This study was performed at a public hospital.
PATIENTS: Forty-six men with symptoms of obstructed defecation were included.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent dynamic transperineal ultrasound 1 week
after standard defecography with manometric confirmation when rectoanal
dyssynergy was observed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Images were obtained, and anorectal angles were measured
under resting conditions and during maximal strain. The accuracy of the
sonographic method in diagnosing pelvic floor alterations was assessed against
defecography (reference method).
RESULTS: : Anorectal angles measured with ultrasound and defecography were not
significantly different under resting conditions or maximum strain. Sonographic
and reference method findings were concordant in 41 (89.1%) of the cases (25 with
rectoanal intussusceptions, 7 with rectorectal intussusceptions, 8 with rectoanal
dyssynergy, and 1 with rectorectal intussusception and dyssynergy). In 1 patient
with rectoanal intussusception, dynamic transperineal ultrasound was
nondiagnostic (low image quality probably due to dehydration of perineal
tissues). Discordant dynamic transperineal ultrasound findings included normal
findings in another patient with rectoanal intussusception, diagnosis of
rectoanal intussusception in 2 men with rectorectal intussusception, and failure
to detect dyssynergy in a second patient with rectorectal intussusception and
dyssynergy. The sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen κ indices for dynamic
transperineal ultrasound were 92.6%, 90.5%, and 82% (rectoanal intussusception);
81.8%, 100%, and 87% (rectorectal intussusception); 90%, 100%, and 93% (rectoanal
dyssynergy).
LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small size and by the absence of
patients with other morphofunctional disorders associated with obstructed
defecation.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic transperineal ultrasound is potentially useful for diagnosis
and follow-up of posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in men.
KW - Constipation
KW - Defecography
KW - Intussusception
KW - Pelvic Floor
KW - Constipation
KW - Defecography
KW - Intussusception
KW - Pelvic Floor
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/57470
U2 - 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825ef8ec
DO - 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825ef8ec
M3 - Article
SN - 0012-3706
VL - 55
SP - 976
EP - 982
JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
ER -