TY - JOUR
T1 - Donor-Recipient MELD-Based Match in a Patient Who Required Three Liver Grafts in the Era of Nonstandard Donors: Case Report
AU - Avolio, Alfonso Wolfango
AU - Barbarino, R.
AU - Siciliano, Massimo
AU - Annicchiarico, Brigida Eleonora
AU - Frongillo, Francesco
AU - Agnes, Salvatore
AU - Castagneto, M.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - In recent studies, nonstandard donors and high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) values have been indicated as risk factors for both graft survival and patient survival. A recent debate concerns which donor and recipient match guarantees the best results in terms of early and late survival. To emphasize the role of the donor-recipient match, we have reported herein a complex case of a patient who changed his preoperative risk status, being transplanted three times using donors of different risk levels. At each transplant, the patient moved to a higher MELD class: first transplant MELD = 22; second transplant MELD = 37; third transplant MELD = 38. Only at the third transplant did the patient recover. Besides the liver, almost all his organs (kidneys, heart, lungs) recovered in a few weeks, as well. Unfortunately, severe cortical and subcortical brain damage remained a crucial limiting impairment, leading to death 5 months later, due to pulmonary infection, yet with a perfectly working liver. We underlined the role of donor factors to predict the outcome after liver transplantation in the MELD era. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
AB - In recent studies, nonstandard donors and high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) values have been indicated as risk factors for both graft survival and patient survival. A recent debate concerns which donor and recipient match guarantees the best results in terms of early and late survival. To emphasize the role of the donor-recipient match, we have reported herein a complex case of a patient who changed his preoperative risk status, being transplanted three times using donors of different risk levels. At each transplant, the patient moved to a higher MELD class: first transplant MELD = 22; second transplant MELD = 37; third transplant MELD = 38. Only at the third transplant did the patient recover. Besides the liver, almost all his organs (kidneys, heart, lungs) recovered in a few weeks, as well. Unfortunately, severe cortical and subcortical brain damage remained a crucial limiting impairment, leading to death 5 months later, due to pulmonary infection, yet with a perfectly working liver. We underlined the role of donor factors to predict the outcome after liver transplantation in the MELD era. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
KW - Aged
KW - Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
KW - Fatal Outcome
KW - Female
KW - Graft Survival
KW - Histocompatibility Testing
KW - Humans
KW - Liver Neoplasms
KW - Liver Transplantation
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Reoperation
KW - Tissue Donors
KW - Aged
KW - Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
KW - Fatal Outcome
KW - Female
KW - Graft Survival
KW - Histocompatibility Testing
KW - Humans
KW - Liver Neoplasms
KW - Liver Transplantation
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Reoperation
KW - Tissue Donors
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/141897
UR - https://www.journals.elsevier.com/transplantation-proceedings
U2 - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.06.004
M3 - Article
SN - 0041-1345
VL - 40
SP - 2067
EP - 2069
JO - Transplantation Proceedings
JF - Transplantation Proceedings
ER -