Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that consumers’ decisions regarding supplementary pensions could be affected by biases. Bernatzi and Thaler’s experiment demonstrated that menu design can influence pension fund enrollment decisions, in that participants appear to adopt a naïve heuristic, i.e., “extremeness aversion”. Using a database of 27 occupational\r\npension funds from 2007 to 2011, representing 1,732,530 employees, this study asked whether menu design affected\r\nItalian workers’ choices regarding the supplementary pension system as a result of the new rules enacted by the regulator in 2007. Most enrolled workers opted for the median investment line. I discuss the possible relevance of this result to public policy, in particular the possibility of including these preferences in the regulations, with the aim of benefiting employees.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 77-82 |
| Numero di pagine | 6 |
| Rivista | Judgment and Decision Making |
| Volume | 9 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 1 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2014 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Scienze delle Decisioni Generali
- Psicologia Applicata
- Economia ed Econometria
Keywords
- decision making
- pension funds
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Does menu design influence retirement investment choices ? evidence from Italian occupational pension funds'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver