TY - UNPB
T1 - Do Fiscal Rules Matter? A Difference-in-Discontinuities Design
AU - Grembi, Veronica
AU - Nanninici, Tommaso
AU - Troiano, Ugo
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - We evaluate the e ect of relaxing scal rules on budget outcomes in a quasi-experimental
setup. In 1999, the Italian central government introduced scal rules|also known as
the Domestic Stability Pact|aimed at imposing scal discipline on municipal govern-
ments, and in 2001 the rules were relaxed for municipalities below 5,000 inhabitants.
This institutional change allows us to implement a \di erence-in-discontinuities" design
by combining the before/after with the discontinuous policy variation. Our estimates
show that relaxing scal rules triggers a substantial de cit bias, captured by a shift
from zero de cit to a de cit that amounts to 2 percent of the total budget. The ad-
justment mostly involves revenues as unconstrained municipalities cut their real estate
and income taxation. The impact is larger if the mayor can run for reelection, the
number of political parties seated in the city council is higher, voters are older, and the
e ciency of public good provision is lower, consistently with models on the political
economy of de cit. A falsi cation test in 1999 shows that our ndings are not driven
by cities just below and above 5,000 being di erentially a ected by scal rules.
AB - We evaluate the e ect of relaxing scal rules on budget outcomes in a quasi-experimental
setup. In 1999, the Italian central government introduced scal rules|also known as
the Domestic Stability Pact|aimed at imposing scal discipline on municipal govern-
ments, and in 2001 the rules were relaxed for municipalities below 5,000 inhabitants.
This institutional change allows us to implement a \di erence-in-discontinuities" design
by combining the before/after with the discontinuous policy variation. Our estimates
show that relaxing scal rules triggers a substantial de cit bias, captured by a shift
from zero de cit to a de cit that amounts to 2 percent of the total budget. The ad-
justment mostly involves revenues as unconstrained municipalities cut their real estate
and income taxation. The impact is larger if the mayor can run for reelection, the
number of political parties seated in the city council is higher, voters are older, and the
e ciency of public good provision is lower, consistently with models on the political
economy of de cit. A falsi cation test in 1999 shows that our ndings are not driven
by cities just below and above 5,000 being di erentially a ected by scal rules.
KW - Difference in Discontinuities
KW - Fiscal Rules
KW - Difference in Discontinuities
KW - Fiscal Rules
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/27678
UR - http://www.igier.unibocconi.it/folder.php?vedi=5173&tbn=albero&id_folder=4878
M3 - Working paper
BT - Do Fiscal Rules Matter? A Difference-in-Discontinuities Design
ER -