TY - JOUR
T1 - Distinct Clinicopathological and Prognostic Features of Thin Nodular Primary Melanomas: An International Study from 17 Centers
AU - Dessinioti, C.
AU - Dimou, N.
AU - Geller, A. C.
AU - Stergiopoulou, A.
AU - Lo, S.
AU - Keim, U.
AU - Gershenwald, J. E.
AU - Haydu, L. E.
AU - Ribero, S.
AU - Quaglino, P.
AU - Puig, S.
AU - Malvehy, J.
AU - Kandolf-Sekulovic, L.
AU - Radevic, T.
AU - Kaufmann, R.
AU - Meister, L.
AU - Nagore, E.
AU - Traves, V.
AU - Champsas, G. G.
AU - Plaka, M.
AU - Dreno, B.
AU - Varey, E.
AU - Ramirez, D. M.
AU - Dummer, R.
AU - Mangana, J.
AU - Hauschild, A.
AU - Egberts, F.
AU - Peris, Ketty
AU - Del, Regno L.
AU - -M., Forsea A.
AU - Zurac, S. A.
AU - Vieira, R.
AU - Brinca, A.
AU - Zalaudek, I.
AU - Deinlein, T.
AU - Linos, E.
AU - Evangelou, E.
AU - Thompson, J. F.
AU - Scolyer, R. A.
AU - Garbe, C.
AU - Stratigos, A. J.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - BACKGROUND: Nodular melanoma (NM) is more likely to be fatal compared with other melanoma subtypes, an effect attributed to its greater Breslow thickness. METHODS: Clinicopathological features of NM and superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) diagnosed in 17 centers in Europe (n = 15), the United States, and Australia between 2006 and 2015, were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression analysis, with emphasis on thin (T1 ≤ 1.0 mm) melanomas. Cox analysis assessed melanoma-specific survival. All statistical tests were two sided. RESULTS: In all, 20 132 melanomas (NM: 5062, SSM: 15 070) were included. Compared with T1 SSM, T1 NM was less likely to have regression (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29 to 0.72) or nevus remnants histologically (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.85), and more likely to have mitoses (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.33 to 2.93) and regional metastasis (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.02 to 3.05). T1 NM had a higher mitotic rate than T1 SSM (adjusted geometric mean = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.9 to 2.5 vs 1.6, 95% CI = 1.5 to 1.7 per mm2, P < .001). Cox multivariable analysis showed a higher risk for melanoma-specific death for NM compared with SSM for T1 (HR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.24 to 3.56) and T2 melanomas (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.68), and after accounting for center heterogeneity, the difference was statistically significant only for T1 (HR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.28 to 3.78). The NM subtype did not confer increased risk within each stratum (among localized tumors or cases with regional metastasis). CONCLUSIONS: T1 NM (compared with T1 SSM) was associated with a constellation of aggressive characteristics that may confer a worse prognosis. Our results indicate NM is a high-risk melanoma subtype that should be considered for inclusion in future prognostic classifications of melanoma.
AB - BACKGROUND: Nodular melanoma (NM) is more likely to be fatal compared with other melanoma subtypes, an effect attributed to its greater Breslow thickness. METHODS: Clinicopathological features of NM and superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) diagnosed in 17 centers in Europe (n = 15), the United States, and Australia between 2006 and 2015, were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression analysis, with emphasis on thin (T1 ≤ 1.0 mm) melanomas. Cox analysis assessed melanoma-specific survival. All statistical tests were two sided. RESULTS: In all, 20 132 melanomas (NM: 5062, SSM: 15 070) were included. Compared with T1 SSM, T1 NM was less likely to have regression (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29 to 0.72) or nevus remnants histologically (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.85), and more likely to have mitoses (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.33 to 2.93) and regional metastasis (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.02 to 3.05). T1 NM had a higher mitotic rate than T1 SSM (adjusted geometric mean = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.9 to 2.5 vs 1.6, 95% CI = 1.5 to 1.7 per mm2, P < .001). Cox multivariable analysis showed a higher risk for melanoma-specific death for NM compared with SSM for T1 (HR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.24 to 3.56) and T2 melanomas (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.68), and after accounting for center heterogeneity, the difference was statistically significant only for T1 (HR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.28 to 3.78). The NM subtype did not confer increased risk within each stratum (among localized tumors or cases with regional metastasis). CONCLUSIONS: T1 NM (compared with T1 SSM) was associated with a constellation of aggressive characteristics that may confer a worse prognosis. Our results indicate NM is a high-risk melanoma subtype that should be considered for inclusion in future prognostic classifications of melanoma.
KW - nodular melanoma
KW - nodular melanoma
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/205969
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068080459&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068080459&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djz034
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djz034
M3 - Article
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 111
SP - 1314
EP - 1322
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 12
ER -