Discussion to: Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications by Y. Ni, V. Baladandayuthapani, M. Vannucci and F.C. Stingo

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

Abstract

We contribute to the discussion of the paper by Ni et al. (Stat Methods Appl, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-021-00572-8) by focusing on two aspects: (i) ordering of the variables for directed acyclic graphical models, and (ii) heterogeneity of the data in the presence of covariates. With regard to (i) we claim that an ordering should be assumed only when strongly reliable prior information is available; otherwise one should proceed with an unspecified ordering to guard against order misspecification. Alternatively, one can carry out Bayesian inference on the space of Markov equivalence classes or use a blend of observational and interventional data to alleviate the lack of identification. With regard to (ii) we complement the Authors’ analysis by enlarging the scope to mixed graphs as well as nonparametric Bayesian models.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)N/A-N/A
Numero di pagine7
RivistaSTATISTICAL METHODS & APPLICATIONS
VolumeN/A
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2021

Keywords

  • Covariate adjustment
  • DAG-Wishart prior
  • Heterogeneity
  • Markov equivalence
  • Parent ordering

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Discussion to: Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications by Y. Ni, V. Baladandayuthapani, M. Vannucci and F.C. Stingo'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo