TY - JOUR
T1 - Discordance of KRAS Mutational Status between Primary Tumors and Liver Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: Impact on Long-Term Survival Following Radical Resection
AU - Ardito, Francesco
AU - Razionale, Francesco
AU - Salvatore, Lisa
AU - Cenci, Tonia
AU - Vellone, Maria
AU - Basso, Michele
AU - Panettieri, Elena
AU - Calegari, Maria Alessandra
AU - Tortora, Giampaolo
AU - Martini, Maurizio
AU - Giuliante, Felice
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - If KRAS mutation status of primary colorectal tumor is representative of corresponding\r\ncolorectal liver metastases (CRLM) mutational pattern, is controversial. Several studies have\r\nreported different rates of KRAS discordance, ranging from 4 to 32%. Aim of this study is to assess\r\nthe incidence of discordance and its impact on overall survival (OS) in a homogenous group of\r\npatients. KRAS mutation status was evaluated in 107 patients resected for both primary colorectal\r\ntumor and corresponding CRLM at the same institution, between 2007 and 2018. Discordance rate\r\nwas 15.9%. Its incidence varied according to the time interval between the two mutation analyses\r\n(p = 0.025; Pearson correlation = 0.2) and it was significantly higher during the first 6 months from\r\nthe time of primary tumor evaluation. On multivariable analysis, type of discordance (wild‐type in\r\nprimary tumor, mutation in CRLM) was the strongest predictor of poor OS (p < 0.001). At\r\nmultivariable logistic regression analysis, the number of CRLM >3 was an independent risk factor\r\nfor the risk of KRAS discordance associated with the worst prognosis (OR = 4.600; p = 0.047). Results\r\nof our study suggested that, in the era of precision medicine, possibility of KRAS discordance\r\nshould be taken into account within multidisciplinary management of patients with metastatic\r\ncolorectal cancer.
AB - If KRAS mutation status of primary colorectal tumor is representative of corresponding\r\ncolorectal liver metastases (CRLM) mutational pattern, is controversial. Several studies have\r\nreported different rates of KRAS discordance, ranging from 4 to 32%. Aim of this study is to assess\r\nthe incidence of discordance and its impact on overall survival (OS) in a homogenous group of\r\npatients. KRAS mutation status was evaluated in 107 patients resected for both primary colorectal\r\ntumor and corresponding CRLM at the same institution, between 2007 and 2018. Discordance rate\r\nwas 15.9%. Its incidence varied according to the time interval between the two mutation analyses\r\n(p = 0.025; Pearson correlation = 0.2) and it was significantly higher during the first 6 months from\r\nthe time of primary tumor evaluation. On multivariable analysis, type of discordance (wild‐type in\r\nprimary tumor, mutation in CRLM) was the strongest predictor of poor OS (p < 0.001). At\r\nmultivariable logistic regression analysis, the number of CRLM >3 was an independent risk factor\r\nfor the risk of KRAS discordance associated with the worst prognosis (OR = 4.600; p = 0.047). Results\r\nof our study suggested that, in the era of precision medicine, possibility of KRAS discordance\r\nshould be taken into account within multidisciplinary management of patients with metastatic\r\ncolorectal cancer.
KW - KRAS mutation status
KW - colorectal liver metastases
KW - colorectal tumor
KW - precision medicine
KW - KRAS mutation status
KW - colorectal liver metastases
KW - colorectal tumor
KW - precision medicine
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/178685
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85106538830&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85106538830&origin=inward
U2 - 10.3390/cancers13092148
DO - 10.3390/cancers13092148
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 13
SP - 2148
EP - 2163
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 9
ER -