TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical practice guideline
AU - Raghu, Ganesh
AU - Remy-Jardin, Martine
AU - Myers, Jeffrey L.
AU - Richeldi, Luca
AU - Ryerson, Christopher J.
AU - Lederer, David J.
AU - Behr, Juergen
AU - Cottin, Vincent
AU - Danoff, Sonye K.
AU - Morell, Ferran
AU - Flaherty, Kevin R.
AU - Wells, Athol
AU - Martinez, Fernando J.
AU - Azuma, Arata
AU - Bice, Thomas J.
AU - Bouros, Demosthenes
AU - Brown, Kevin K.
AU - Collard, Harold R.
AU - Duggal, Abhijit
AU - Galvin, Liam
AU - Inoue, Yoshikazu
AU - Gisli Jenkins, R.
AU - Johkoh, Takeshi
AU - Kazerooni, Ella A.
AU - Kitaichi, Masanori
AU - Knight, Shandra L.
AU - Mansour, George
AU - Nicholson, Andrew G.
AU - Pipavath, Sudhakar N.J.
AU - Buendía-Roldán, Ivette
AU - Selman, Moisés
AU - Travis, William D.
AU - Walsh, Simon
AU - Wilson, Kevin C.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: This document provides clinical recommendations for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It represents a collaborative effort between the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society. Methods: The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by a multidisciplinary committee of IPF experts. The evidence was appraised and recommendations were formulated, written, and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: The guideline panel updated the diagnostic criteria for IPF Previously defined patterns of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) were refined to patterns of UIP, probable UIP, indeterminate, and alternate diagnosis. For patients with newly detected interstitial lung disease (ILD) who have a high-resolution computed tomography scan pattern of probable UIP, indeterminate, or an alternative diagnosis, conditional recommendations were made for performing BAL and surgical lung biopsy; because of lack of evidence, no recommendation was made for or against performing transbronchial lung biopsy or lung cryobiopsy. In contrast, for patients with newly detected ILD who have a high-resolution computed tomography scan pattern of UIP, strong recommendations were made against performing surgical lung biopsy, transbronchial lung biopsy, and lung cryobiopsy, and a conditional recommendation was made against performing BAL. Additional recommendations included a conditional recommendation for multidisciplinary discussion and a strong recommendation against measurement of serum biomarkers for the sole purpose of distinguishing IPF from other ILDs. Conclusions: The guideline panel provided recommendations related to the diagnosis of IPF.
AB - Background: This document provides clinical recommendations for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It represents a collaborative effort between the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Latin American Thoracic Society. Methods: The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by a multidisciplinary committee of IPF experts. The evidence was appraised and recommendations were formulated, written, and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: The guideline panel updated the diagnostic criteria for IPF Previously defined patterns of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) were refined to patterns of UIP, probable UIP, indeterminate, and alternate diagnosis. For patients with newly detected interstitial lung disease (ILD) who have a high-resolution computed tomography scan pattern of probable UIP, indeterminate, or an alternative diagnosis, conditional recommendations were made for performing BAL and surgical lung biopsy; because of lack of evidence, no recommendation was made for or against performing transbronchial lung biopsy or lung cryobiopsy. In contrast, for patients with newly detected ILD who have a high-resolution computed tomography scan pattern of UIP, strong recommendations were made against performing surgical lung biopsy, transbronchial lung biopsy, and lung cryobiopsy, and a conditional recommendation was made against performing BAL. Additional recommendations included a conditional recommendation for multidisciplinary discussion and a strong recommendation against measurement of serum biomarkers for the sole purpose of distinguishing IPF from other ILDs. Conclusions: The guideline panel provided recommendations related to the diagnosis of IPF.
KW - Biopsy
KW - Europe
KW - Humans
KW - Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
KW - Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
KW - Interstitial lung disease
KW - Japan
KW - Latin America
KW - Lung
KW - Pulmonary fibrosis
KW - Societies, Medical
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed
KW - United States
KW - Biopsy
KW - Europe
KW - Humans
KW - Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
KW - Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
KW - Interstitial lung disease
KW - Japan
KW - Latin America
KW - Lung
KW - Pulmonary fibrosis
KW - Societies, Medical
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed
KW - United States
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/157848
U2 - 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST
DO - 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST
M3 - Article
SN - 1073-449X
VL - 198
SP - e44-e68
JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
ER -