TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a checklist as self-assessment tool to evaluate the reprocessing of endoscopic instruments in an Italian teaching hospital
AU - Vincenti, Sara
AU - Colamesta, Vittoria
AU - Nurchis, Mario Cesare
AU - Damiani, Gianfranco
AU - Pascucci, Domenico
AU - Boninti, Federica
AU - Wachocka, Malgorzata
AU - Sapienza, Martina
AU - Sganga, Gabriele
AU - Laurenti, Patrizia
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to develop a checklist, as a self-assessment tool, for evaluating all the items involved in the endoscope reprocessing that could be useful for the improvement and/or development of a safety endoscope reprocessing system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-step modified Delphi method, with an embedded qualitative component, was adopted to develop the checklist. According to it, corrective actions were performed before its further re-administration. Contextually, the microbiological surveillance of the endoscopes and of the wash disinfector machine was carried out. RESULTS: Five areas were included in the checklist. After the 1st checklist application, only one of three wards reached the excellent scores in all the items. The other two wards showed an improvement in the Traceability and Endoscope Reprocessing areas after corrective actions. The McNemar's test reported significant difference in the proportion of satisfactory results before and after the 1st and 2nd checklist application. The microbiological surveillance, conducted after the 1stadministration, showed unsatisfactory results for the 2 bronchoscopes available in the Intensive Care Unit and for 2 automated endoscope reprocessors. The analysis performed after the 2ndadministration showed good results. CONCLUSIONS: The periodic administration of the checklist is functional for a self-assessment of quality reprocessing procedures carried out in the large endoscopic services and in the wards occasionally providing those services, according to the good practice guidelines and for any corrective actions to increase the safety.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to develop a checklist, as a self-assessment tool, for evaluating all the items involved in the endoscope reprocessing that could be useful for the improvement and/or development of a safety endoscope reprocessing system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-step modified Delphi method, with an embedded qualitative component, was adopted to develop the checklist. According to it, corrective actions were performed before its further re-administration. Contextually, the microbiological surveillance of the endoscopes and of the wash disinfector machine was carried out. RESULTS: Five areas were included in the checklist. After the 1st checklist application, only one of three wards reached the excellent scores in all the items. The other two wards showed an improvement in the Traceability and Endoscope Reprocessing areas after corrective actions. The McNemar's test reported significant difference in the proportion of satisfactory results before and after the 1st and 2nd checklist application. The microbiological surveillance, conducted after the 1stadministration, showed unsatisfactory results for the 2 bronchoscopes available in the Intensive Care Unit and for 2 automated endoscope reprocessors. The analysis performed after the 2ndadministration showed good results. CONCLUSIONS: The periodic administration of the checklist is functional for a self-assessment of quality reprocessing procedures carried out in the large endoscopic services and in the wards occasionally providing those services, according to the good practice guidelines and for any corrective actions to increase the safety.
KW - Checklist
KW - Delphi method
KW - Endoscope reprocessing
KW - Self-assessment tool
KW - Checklist
KW - Delphi method
KW - Endoscope reprocessing
KW - Self-assessment tool
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/195246
U2 - 10.26355/eurrev_202108_26460
DO - 10.26355/eurrev_202108_26460
M3 - Article
SN - 1128-3602
VL - 25
SP - 5029
EP - 5041
JO - European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
JF - European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
ER -