Delays in medical malpractice litigation in civil law jurisdictions: some evidence from the Italian Court of Cassation

Veronica Grembi, Nuno Garoupa

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in rivistaArticolo in rivista

8 Citazioni (Scopus)

Abstract

Medical malpractice law and tort reform are contentious issues. In this paper, we focus on Italy as an example of a civil law jurisdiction. Italian medical malpractice law is essentially judge-made law. However, its effectiveness is likely to be curtailed by excessive delays in litigation. Several reforms have been enacted since the late 1980s to correct this situation. By making use of the decisions of the Italian Court of Cassation (which have shaped medical malpractice law) from 1970 to 2009, we show that these reforms had no general statistically significant impact on delays. Recent reduction of delays does not seem to be related to legal reforms but rather explained by other factors.
Lingua originaleEnglish
pagine (da-a)423-52-452
RivistaHealth Economics, Policy and Law
Volume8
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2013

Keywords

  • Decision Making
  • Humans
  • Italy
  • Judicial Role
  • Liability, Legal
  • Malpractice
  • Models, Econometric
  • State Medicine
  • Time Factors

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Delays in medical malpractice litigation in civil law jurisdictions: some evidence from the Italian Court of Cassation'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo