TY - JOUR
T1 - Deep sequencing analysis identified a specific subset of mutations distinctive of biphasic malignant pleural mesothelioma
AU - Torricelli, Federica
AU - Lococo, Filippo
AU - Di Stefano, Teresa Severina
AU - Lorenzini, Eugenia
AU - Piana, Simonetta
AU - Valli, Riccardo
AU - Rena, Ottavio
AU - Veronesi, Giulia
AU - Billè, Andrea
AU - Ciarrocchi, Alessia
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a heterogeneous disease. Morphologically, three different phenotypes are distinguishable: epithelioid (e-), sarcomatoid (s-) and biphasic (biph-) MPM, the latest, being a mixture of e-and s-MPM cells. Being an intermediate entity, management of biph-MPM, remains debatable and controversial, with different guidelines recommending distinct approaches. Identification of biph-MPM associated genetic alterations, through deep sequencing analysis, may provide useful tools to understand these lesions. A retrospective cohort of 69 surgically resected MPMs, 39 biph-MPMs (56.5%) and 30 e-MPMs (43.5%) was selected. A separate set of 16 biph-MPM was used as validation set. Deep sequencing analysis on an MPM-specific custom panel (MPM_geneset) comprising 1041 amplicons spanning 34 genes was performed. A total of 588 variants and 5309 mutational events were detected. In total, 91.3% of MPMs showed at least one mutation and 76.8% showed co-occurrence of more than one alteration. Mutations in MXRA5 (p = 0.05) and NOD2 (p = 0.018) were significantly associated with biph-MPM both in the training and validation cohort and correlated with the extent of the sarcomatoid component. Mutations in NOD2 and XRCC6 correlated with patients’ survival. We demonstrated that biph-MPM are associated with a specific mutation set, and that genetic analysis at diagnosis may improve patients’ risk stratification.
AB - Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a heterogeneous disease. Morphologically, three different phenotypes are distinguishable: epithelioid (e-), sarcomatoid (s-) and biphasic (biph-) MPM, the latest, being a mixture of e-and s-MPM cells. Being an intermediate entity, management of biph-MPM, remains debatable and controversial, with different guidelines recommending distinct approaches. Identification of biph-MPM associated genetic alterations, through deep sequencing analysis, may provide useful tools to understand these lesions. A retrospective cohort of 69 surgically resected MPMs, 39 biph-MPMs (56.5%) and 30 e-MPMs (43.5%) was selected. A separate set of 16 biph-MPM was used as validation set. Deep sequencing analysis on an MPM-specific custom panel (MPM_geneset) comprising 1041 amplicons spanning 34 genes was performed. A total of 588 variants and 5309 mutational events were detected. In total, 91.3% of MPMs showed at least one mutation and 76.8% showed co-occurrence of more than one alteration. Mutations in MXRA5 (p = 0.05) and NOD2 (p = 0.018) were significantly associated with biph-MPM both in the training and validation cohort and correlated with the extent of the sarcomatoid component. Mutations in NOD2 and XRCC6 correlated with patients’ survival. We demonstrated that biph-MPM are associated with a specific mutation set, and that genetic analysis at diagnosis may improve patients’ risk stratification.
KW - Genetic mutations
KW - Histotype
KW - Malignant pleural mesothelioma
KW - Next generation sequencing
KW - Genetic mutations
KW - Histotype
KW - Malignant pleural mesothelioma
KW - Next generation sequencing
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/178521
U2 - 10.3390/cancers12092454
DO - 10.3390/cancers12092454
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
ER -