TY - JOUR
T1 - Dedicated mass-casualty incident hospitals: An overview
AU - Haverkort, J.J. Mark
AU - De Jong, Mirjam B.
AU - Foco, Maurizio
AU - Gui, Daniele
AU - Barhoum, Masad
AU - Hyams, Gila
AU - Bahouth, Hany
AU - Halberthal, Michael
AU - Leenen, Luke P.H.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Introduction Hospitals worldwide are preparing for mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The Major Incident Hospital in the Netherlands was constructed 25 years ago as a dedicated hospital for situations wherein a sudden increase in medical surge capacity is mandated to handle an MCI. Over the years, more initiatives of dedicated MCIs have arisen. Herein, we compared the MCI facilities from three countries considering the reasons for construction and the functionality. Methods Three dedicated mass casualty hospitals and one hospital with a largely fortified structure were compared. The centres were located in the Netherlands, Italy, and Israel. Between August 2015 and January 2016, structured interviews were conducted with representatives of the hospitals’ medical operations. The interviews focussed on general information regarding the need for MCI preparedness and scenarios that require preparation, reasons for construction, hospital missions, and the experiences gained including training. Results All dedicated MCI hospitals had a common policy wherein they sought to create normal work circumstances for the medical staff by using similar equipment and resources as in normal hospitals. The MCI hospitals’ designs differed substantially, as determined by the threats faced by the country. In Europe, these hospitals are designed as a solution to surge capacity and function as buffer hospitals offering readily available, short term, additional medical capacity to the local health care system. Israel faces constant threat from long-term conflicts; during the 2006 war, several hospitals suffered direct missile impacts. Therefore, Israeli MCI hospitals are designed to be fortified structures offering shelter against both conventional and non-conventional warfare and intended as a long-term solution during siege situations. Conclusion Several dedicated MCI hospitals are presently being constructed. During construction, the local circumstances should be taken into account to determine the functionality for both short-term solutions for surge capacity and as fortified structures to withstand under-siege situations.
AB - Introduction Hospitals worldwide are preparing for mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The Major Incident Hospital in the Netherlands was constructed 25 years ago as a dedicated hospital for situations wherein a sudden increase in medical surge capacity is mandated to handle an MCI. Over the years, more initiatives of dedicated MCIs have arisen. Herein, we compared the MCI facilities from three countries considering the reasons for construction and the functionality. Methods Three dedicated mass casualty hospitals and one hospital with a largely fortified structure were compared. The centres were located in the Netherlands, Italy, and Israel. Between August 2015 and January 2016, structured interviews were conducted with representatives of the hospitals’ medical operations. The interviews focussed on general information regarding the need for MCI preparedness and scenarios that require preparation, reasons for construction, hospital missions, and the experiences gained including training. Results All dedicated MCI hospitals had a common policy wherein they sought to create normal work circumstances for the medical staff by using similar equipment and resources as in normal hospitals. The MCI hospitals’ designs differed substantially, as determined by the threats faced by the country. In Europe, these hospitals are designed as a solution to surge capacity and function as buffer hospitals offering readily available, short term, additional medical capacity to the local health care system. Israel faces constant threat from long-term conflicts; during the 2006 war, several hospitals suffered direct missile impacts. Therefore, Israeli MCI hospitals are designed to be fortified structures offering shelter against both conventional and non-conventional warfare and intended as a long-term solution during siege situations. Conclusion Several dedicated MCI hospitals are presently being constructed. During construction, the local circumstances should be taken into account to determine the functionality for both short-term solutions for surge capacity and as fortified structures to withstand under-siege situations.
KW - Disaster
KW - Disaster medicine
KW - Emergency Medicine
KW - Major incident
KW - Major incident hospital
KW - Mass casualty incident
KW - Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
KW - Preparedness
KW - Surge capacity
KW - Disaster
KW - Disaster medicine
KW - Emergency Medicine
KW - Major incident
KW - Major incident hospital
KW - Mass casualty incident
KW - Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
KW - Preparedness
KW - Surge capacity
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/170814
UR - http://www.elsevier.com/locate/injury
U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.025
DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.025
M3 - Article
SN - 0020-1383
VL - 48
SP - 322
EP - 326
JO - Injury
JF - Injury
ER -