Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care

Sarah Francesca Maria Bigi; Nanon Labrie

Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care

Sarah Francesca Maria Bigi
, Nanon Labrie

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in libro › Contributo a conferenza

Abstract

The study of medical argumentation typically draws on empirical data. This poses a challenge, as in medical practice, utterances that serve an argumentative purpose are intertwined with utterances that serve different dialogical – as well as clinical – goals. Comprehensive understanding of the communicative context is thus imperative. This contribution seeks to provide a blueprint for the analysis of medical argumentation in context. Doing so, chronic care consultation is used as a particular example of doctor-patient interaction.

Lingua originale	Inglese
Titolo della pubblicazione ospite	Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015
Pagine	251-265
Numero di pagine	15
Stato di pubblicazione	Pubblicato - 2016
Evento	1st European Conference on Argumentation - Lisbona, Portogallo Durata: 9 giu 2015 → 12 giu 2015

Convegno

Convegno	1st European Conference on Argumentation
Città	Lisbona, Portogallo
Periodo	9/6/15 → 12/6/15

Keywords

activity type
chronic care consultation
empirical data
medical argumentation

Altri file e collegamenti

Link a IRIS PubliCatt

Cita questo

@inproceedings{7e7fed06c20543678bb3158889f91e66,

title = "Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors{\textquoteright} argumentation in the context of chronic care",

abstract = "The study of medical argumentation typically draws on empirical data. This poses a challenge, as in medical practice, utterances that serve an argumentative purpose are intertwined with utterances that serve different dialogical – as well as clinical – goals. Comprehensive understanding of the communicative context is thus imperative. This contribution seeks to provide a blueprint for the analysis of medical argumentation in context. Doing so, chronic care consultation is used as a particular example of doctor-patient interaction.",

keywords = "activity type, chronic care consultation, empirical data, medical argumentation, activity type, chronic care consultation, empirical data, medical argumentation",

author = "Bigi, \{Sarah Francesca Maria\} and Nanon Labrie",

year = "2016",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-84890-212-1",

pages = "251--265",

booktitle = "Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015",

note = "1st European Conference on Argumentation ; Conference date: 09-06-2015 Through 12-06-2015",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care

AU - Bigi, Sarah Francesca Maria

AU - Labrie, Nanon

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The study of medical argumentation typically draws on empirical data. This poses a challenge, as in medical practice, utterances that serve an argumentative purpose are intertwined with utterances that serve different dialogical – as well as clinical – goals. Comprehensive understanding of the communicative context is thus imperative. This contribution seeks to provide a blueprint for the analysis of medical argumentation in context. Doing so, chronic care consultation is used as a particular example of doctor-patient interaction.

AB - The study of medical argumentation typically draws on empirical data. This poses a challenge, as in medical practice, utterances that serve an argumentative purpose are intertwined with utterances that serve different dialogical – as well as clinical – goals. Comprehensive understanding of the communicative context is thus imperative. This contribution seeks to provide a blueprint for the analysis of medical argumentation in context. Doing so, chronic care consultation is used as a particular example of doctor-patient interaction.

KW - activity type

KW - chronic care consultation

KW - empirical data

KW - medical argumentation

KW - activity type

KW - chronic care consultation

KW - empirical data

KW - medical argumentation

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/89225

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-84890-212-1

SP - 251

EP - 265

BT - Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015

T2 - 1st European Conference on Argumentation

Y2 - 9 June 2015 through 12 June 2015

ER -

Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care

Abstract

Convegno

Keywords

Altri file e collegamenti

Fingerprint

Cita questo