Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care

Sarah Francesca Maria Bigi, Nanon Labrie, 27260, MILANO - Dipartimento di Scienze linguistiche e letterature straniere

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo in libroContributo a convegno

Abstract

The study of medical argumentation typically draws on empirical data. This poses a challenge, as in medical practice, utterances that serve an argumentative purpose are intertwined with utterances that serve different dialogical – as well as clinical – goals. Comprehensive understanding of the communicative context is thus imperative. This contribution seeks to provide a blueprint for the analysis of medical argumentation in context. Doing so, chronic care consultation is used as a particular example of doctor-patient interaction.
Lingua originaleEnglish
Titolo della pubblicazione ospiteArgumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 2015
Pagine251-265
Numero di pagine15
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2016
Evento1st European Conference on Argumentation - Lisbona, Portogallo
Durata: 9 giu 201512 giu 2015

Convegno

Convegno1st European Conference on Argumentation
CittàLisbona, Portogallo
Periodo9/6/1512/6/15

Keywords

  • activity type
  • chronic care consultation
  • empirical data
  • medical argumentation

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Criteria for the reconstruction and analysis of doctors’ argumentation in the context of chronic care'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo