TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based triple therapy for untreated patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C
AU - Bruno, Rosa Anna
AU - Gasbarrini, Antonio
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - We assessed the cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based triple therapy (TT) compared with boceprevir (BOC)- and telaprevir (TVR)-based TT in untreated genotype 1 (G1) chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients discriminated according to IL28B genotype, severity of liver fibrosis, and G1 subtype. The available published literature provided the data source. The target population was made up of untreated Caucasian patients, aged 50 years, with G1CHC and these were evaluated over a lifetime horizon by Markov model. The study was carried out from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. Outcomes included discounted costs (in euros at 2013 value), life-years gained (LYG), quality-adjusted life year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Cost of SOF was assumed to be € 3,500 per week, i.e., the price generating a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 25,000 per LYG compared with TVR in the entire population of untreated G1 patients. The robustness of the results was evaluated by one-way deterministic and multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analyses. SOF was cost-effective compared with BOC in all strategies with the exception of cirrhosis and IL28B CC patients. In comparison with TVR-based strategies, SOF was cost-effective in IL28B CT/TT (ICER per LYG € 22,229) and G1a (€ 19,359) patients, not cost-effective in IL28B CC (€45,330), fibrosis F0-F3 (€ 26,444), and in cirrhosis (€ 34,906) patients, and dominated in G1b patients. The models were sensitive to SOF prices and to likelihood of sustained virological response.
AB - We assessed the cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based triple therapy (TT) compared with boceprevir (BOC)- and telaprevir (TVR)-based TT in untreated genotype 1 (G1) chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients discriminated according to IL28B genotype, severity of liver fibrosis, and G1 subtype. The available published literature provided the data source. The target population was made up of untreated Caucasian patients, aged 50 years, with G1CHC and these were evaluated over a lifetime horizon by Markov model. The study was carried out from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. Outcomes included discounted costs (in euros at 2013 value), life-years gained (LYG), quality-adjusted life year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Cost of SOF was assumed to be € 3,500 per week, i.e., the price generating a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 25,000 per LYG compared with TVR in the entire population of untreated G1 patients. The robustness of the results was evaluated by one-way deterministic and multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analyses. SOF was cost-effective compared with BOC in all strategies with the exception of cirrhosis and IL28B CC patients. In comparison with TVR-based strategies, SOF was cost-effective in IL28B CT/TT (ICER per LYG € 22,229) and G1a (€ 19,359) patients, not cost-effective in IL28B CC (€45,330), fibrosis F0-F3 (€ 26,444), and in cirrhosis (€ 34,906) patients, and dominated in G1b patients. The models were sensitive to SOF prices and to likelihood of sustained virological response.
KW - Antiviral Agents
KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis
KW - Drug Therapy, Combination
KW - Genotype
KW - Hepacivirus
KW - Hepatitis C, Chronic
KW - Humans
KW - Oligopeptides
KW - Proline
KW - Quality-Adjusted Life Years
KW - Uridine Monophosphate
KW - Antiviral Agents
KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis
KW - Drug Therapy, Combination
KW - Genotype
KW - Hepacivirus
KW - Hepatitis C, Chronic
KW - Humans
KW - Oligopeptides
KW - Proline
KW - Quality-Adjusted Life Years
KW - Uridine Monophosphate
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/60763
U2 - 10.1002/hep.27010
DO - 10.1002/hep.27010
M3 - Article
SN - 1527-3350
VL - 59
SP - 1692
EP - 1705
JO - Hepatology
JF - Hepatology
ER -