Abstract
This article examines the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy (gemcitabine) versus nanotherapy (PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin) in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Significant differences in costs were mainly due to the initial drug costs, which were €1285.28 in favor of chemotherapy. These costs were more than offset by hospitalization costs, which were €2670.21 in favor of the nanotherapy. The cost per quality-adjusted life week (QALW) for the nanotherapy was estimated to be €220.92/QALW for the base case and ranged from €170-318/QALW based on model assumptions. The clinical benefit associated with nanotherapy was achieved, yielding not only positive cost-effectiveness results, but also, surprisingly, financial savings. Although more studies are necessary, this first comprehensive analysis supports the further use of nanotherapy for ovarian cancer.
| Lingua originale | Inglese |
|---|---|
| pagine (da-a) | 2175-2186 |
| Numero di pagine | 12 |
| Rivista | Nanomedicine |
| Volume | 9 |
| Numero di pubblicazione | 14 |
| DOI | |
| Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2014 |
OSS delle Nazioni Unite
Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile
-
SDG 3 Salute e benessere
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Bioingegneria
- Medicina (varie)
- Ingegneria Biomedica
- Scienza dei Materiali Generale
- Sviluppo
Keywords
- gemcitabine vs PEGylated
- ovarian cancer
Fingerprint
Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine versus PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin for recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer: Comparing chemotherapy with nanotherapy'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.Cita questo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver