Abstract
It is well-known that C. Nepos’ Chronica strongly depended from Apollodorus of Athens’ homonymous
work but, though accepting the latter’s datation of many important events of Greek
archaic epoch, offered a different date of Homer’s akmé – 914, against Apollodorus’ 944. Jacoby
argued that Nepos confused akmé and nomoqesiva in the biography of Lycurgus, which was
related to – and helped to determine – Homer’s one. This correct view can be precised : Nepos,
in the passage of Apollodorus’ Chronikà dedicated to the Spartan lawgiver, read that Lycurgus
lived 30 years later than Homer ; wrongly, Nepos intended that 884, when the Spartan lawgiver
was 70 years old and began the renowned constitutional reforms, was the latter’s akmé – i.e. 40th
year of the man. Accordingly, Nepos deduced a new Homeric acme at 914 : the Leichtigkeitsfehler
Jacoby charges him with, is that Nepos did not check this datation in the previous passage,
within Apollodorus’ Chronikà, dedicated to Homer’s biography. The authour of the Latina historia,
source of Jerome’ Canons for the Alban period, put Homer at an even lower date, near to
Lycurgus’ reforms : probably he relied on Nepos, but wrongly intended that the poet and the
lawgiver were contemporary – a misunderstanding in addition to the previous one.
Titolo tradotto del contributo | [Autom. eng. transl.] Cornelius Nepote and the dating of Homer |
---|---|
Lingua originale | Italian |
pagine (da-a) | 51-56 |
Numero di pagine | 6 |
Rivista | Vichiana |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2018 |
Keywords
- Apollodoro di Atene Khronikà
- Cornelio Nepote Chronica
- Omero datazione