Abstract
This paper investigates whether and under what conditions the working of cooperative firms can
be affected by competition law or market-enhancing regulations. The nature of collective benefits
sought by different types of cooperative enterprises is analysed to show whether and how a tension
may arise between the market mechanism and the mechanisms through which alternative collective
benefits are attained by cooperative firms. On the whole, market-enhancing regulations have an
ambiguous impact both on the working of cooperatives and on social efficiency. While benefitting
society, a market enhancement reduces the scope for cooperative firms aiming at reducing the
deadweight loss in imperfectly competitive markets. A similar conclusion holds if the cooperative
firm aims at protecting an investment decision from a hold-up problem, provided that the market
enhancement enlarges the set of outside options for the firm’s stakeholders. A market enlargement
has a positive impact both on the working of cooperatives and on social efficiency when the aim
of the cooperative firm is to prevent shirking in team production. In contrast, a negative impact
ensues, with adverse consequences both for social efficiency and the cooperative firm, when the
collective benefit sought by the latter is to overcome asymmetric information, as typically happens
in the case of credit cooperatives.
Lingua originale | English |
---|---|
pagine (da-a) | 36-53 |
Numero di pagine | 18 |
Rivista | Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 2013 |
Keywords
- comptition policy
- cooperative firms